Canterbury Court
If you’re seeking for a community with a solid reputation in offering seniors high-quality care and services, Canterbury Court is the ideal one for you. The community offers a wide range of indoor and outdoor activities, so there is never a dull time for their residents. With attractive communal areas that promote socialization and contact among residents, the facility is exceptionally clean and well-maintained. Each resident is provided with a tailored care plan that takes into consideration their unique needs, preferences, and medical problems. This makes sure that every resident gets the right amount and type of care.
A chapel for weekly services and quiet reflection, multiple dining choices, a wildlife sanctuary, areas surrounded by lush greenery, a library, fitness classes with a trainer, a woodworking shop, a pool, spacious social areas, a beauty and barber shop, and so much more. The facility also ensures the residents’ safety through their gated and secured resident parking, an emergency response and check-in system, and scheduled transportation services, and the list goes on.
About this community
Canterbury Court is administered by Elizabeth Woltzen.
Inspection History
In Georgia, the Department of Community Health, Healthcare Facility Regulation Division conducts unannounced inspections to ensure facilities adhere to state health and safety requirements.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Georgia state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2025 vs. Georgia state average• Total deficiencies (100% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | GA Average | vs. GA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 0 | 21 | This facility has 100% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Georgia nursing home (0 vs. GA avg 21).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | GA Average | vs. GA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 1 | 17 | This facility has had 94% fewer total inspections than the Georgia average (1 vs. GA avg 17). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 94% fewer |
What does this home offer?
Pets Allowed
Room Sizes: 355 / 536 - 869 / 1,000 - 1,810 sq. ft
Housing Options: Studio / 1 Bed / 2 Bed
Building Type: High-rise
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Canterbury Court
Places of interest near Canterbury Court
7.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Atlanta's city center to Canterbury Court's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Canterbury Court
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Atlanta
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the GA Dept. of Community Health (DCH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Georgia average is: 54.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The William Breman Jewish Home | NH SNF | Atlanta (Buckhead) | 96
Facility
96
GA AVG
87
Rank
#246 / 661 |
96.9%
Facility
96.9%
GA AVG
80.3
Rank
#6 / 152 | +21% | 4.97
Facility
4.97
GA AVG
3.56
Rank
#12 / 180 | +14% | +40% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$38.9k
Rank
#1 / 184 | 10
Facility
10
GA AVG
16.6
Rank
#50 / 183 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#48 / 183 | 2 | 93 | A+ |
23
Facility
23
GA AVG
41
Rank
#596 / 838 | Jeffrey Gopen | $13.2MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$13.2MFiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
$12.8M
Rank
#54 / 169 | $9.4MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
$5.7M
Rank
#19 / 169 | 70.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
70.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
54.8%
Rank
#12 / 169 | 115022 | ||||
| Lenbrook | NH AL MC SNF | Ne Atlanta | 60
Facility
60
GA AVG
87
Rank
#446 / 661 |
81.7%
Facility
81.7%
GA AVG
80.3
Rank
#91 / 152 | +2% | 6.64
Facility
6.64
GA AVG
3.56
Rank
#5 / 180 | +38% | +87% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$38.9k
Rank
#1 / 184 | 2
Facility
2
GA AVG
16.6
Rank
#5 / 183 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#15 / 183 | - | 49 | A+ |
57
Facility
57
GA AVG
41
Rank
#238 / 838 | Mark Kill | $38.2MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$38.2MFiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
$12.8M
Rank
#3 / 169 | $21.4MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$21.4MFiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
$5.7M
Rank
#1 / 169 | 56%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
56%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
54.8%
Rank
#58 / 169 | 115296 | ||||
| The A.G. Rhodes Wesley Woods | NH MC SNF | Atlanta (Victoria Estates) | 150
Facility
150
GA AVG
87
Rank
#67 / 661 |
90.7%
Facility
90.7%
GA AVG
80.3
Rank
#39 / 152 | +13% | 4.55
Facility
4.55
GA AVG
3.56
Rank
#18 / 180 | -12% | +28% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
GA AVG
$38.9k
Rank
#128 / 184 | 13
Facility
13
GA AVG
16.6
Rank
#75 / 183 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#86 / 183 | 1 | 136 | - |
46
Facility
46
GA AVG
41
Rank
#357 / 838 | Christina Phangestu | $19.2MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$19.2MFiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
$12.8M
Rank
#14 / 169 | $9.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$9.0MFiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
$5.7M
Rank
#22 / 169 | 46.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
46.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
54.8%
Rank
#125 / 169 | 115002 | ||||
| Pruitthealth – Virginia Park | NH HOS SNF | Atlanta (Druid Hills) | 128
Facility
128
GA AVG
87
Rank
#101 / 661 |
89.8%
Facility
89.8%
GA AVG
80.3
Rank
#46 / 152 | +12% | 3.40
Facility
3.40
GA AVG
3.56
Rank
#90 / 180 | -7% | -5% | $8.8k
Facility
$8.8k
GA AVG
$38.9k
Rank
#132 / 184 | 19
Facility
19
GA AVG
16.6
Rank
#114 / 183 | 6.3
Facility
6.3
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#134 / 183 | 4 | 115 | - |
50
Facility
50
GA AVG
41
Rank
#311 / 838 | Anthony Grant | $12.7MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$12.7MFiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
$12.8M
Rank
#58 / 169 | $7.1MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
$5.7M
Rank
#44 / 169 | 56%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
56%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
GA AVG
54.8%
Rank
#58 / 169 | 115531 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Georgia
Canterbury Court is located in Atlanta, Georgia.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Georgia.
Frequently Asked Questions about Canterbury Court
What neighborhood is Canterbury Court in?
Canterbury Court is in the Buckhead neighborhood of Atlanta.
Is Canterbury Court in a walkable area?
Canterbury Court has a walk score of 66. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
How long has Canterbury Court been in business?
Canterbury Court has been operating for approximately 2 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Canterbury Court?
Yes, Canterbury Court allows residents to bring their pets.
Who is the administrator of Canterbury Court?
Elizabeth Woltzen is the administrator of Canterbury Court.
How many beds does Canterbury Court have?
Canterbury Court has 73 beds.
Has Canterbury Court had any deficiencies?
Canterbury Court has no reported deficiencies since 2025 according to records from Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH).
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





