Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
92
78 employees · 14 contractors · 37 on an average day Good Samaritan Society – White Acres
Nursing Home, Adult Day Care, Assisted Living, Home Care, Hospice Care, Independent Living, Memory Care & Respite Care · El Paso, TX
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres
Nursing Home, Adult Day Care, Assisted Living, Home Care, Hospice Care, Independent Living, Memory Care & Respite Care · El Paso, TX
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres, located in El Paso, TX, is a senior living community offering a wide array of services to its residents from assisted living, memory care, long-term skilled nursing and post-acute rehabilitation. This senior living community offers accommodation options that include utilities, maintenance, and housekeeping services.
As part of their assisted living and memory care services, they provide residents with 24/z staff availability for supervision and support, assistance with daily living activities, medication management, and wellness programs. Laundry and housekeeping services are also provided, giving the residents more opportunities to do what they enjoy.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 110th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 24m
This nursing home is ranked 110th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 24mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +78% above Texas average
4 of 6 metrics below Texas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
29m
↑ 9% · TX 27mThis facility: 29m per resident per day, 9% above the Texas average of 27m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 8.4-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
53m
↓ 7% · TX 57mThis facility: 53m per resident per day, 7% below the Texas average of 57m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 32 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
32 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
2h 1m
↓ 2% · TX 2h 4mThis facility: 2h 1m per resident per day, 2% below the Texas average of 2h 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 32 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
32 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 68% · TX 4mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 68% below the Texas average of 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 0m
↓ 2% · TX 3h 3mThis facility: 3h 0m per resident per day, 2% below the Texas average of 3h 3m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
37m
↑ 78% · TX 21mThis facility: 37m per resident per day, 78% above the Texas average of 21m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
92
78 employees · 14 contractors · 37 on an average day
92 total staff / 33 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.79 : 1
↑ 90% · TX 1.47This facility: 2.79 staff per resident, 90% above the Texas average of 1.47 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
92 staff ÷ 33 residents
See full Texas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.7 h
↓ 5% · TX 8.1 hThis facility: 7.7 h, 5% below the Texas average of 8.1 h (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
25,788 staff hours this quarter
See full Texas ranking →92.1% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Texas average: 94.3% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (3), Qualified Social Worker (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
150
Rank #46 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
150
Rank #46 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
74 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 76 state-licensed beds.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #62 / 147Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 147 nursing homes we track in Texas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Texas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #62 / 147Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 147 nursing homes we track in Texas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Texas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
43
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #235 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 235th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #235 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 235th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
20
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #49 / 178Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 178 nursing homes we track in Texas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Texas average, with its Statewide rank out of 178. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #49 / 178Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 178 nursing homes we track in Texas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Texas average, with its Statewide rank out of 178. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
84.1%
This home usually has availability
Higher than the Texas average: 72.9%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
62
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
38
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypeType B
CountyEl Paso
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres is legally operated by White Acres Assisted Living LLC.
Resident Council
Alzheimer's Certification
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Caregiver Support
Transportation
Housekeeping
Pets not allowed
Fitness Center
Patio
Wi-Fi
Chapel
Room Types
Cottage / Villa
Two inspection records, one community. Texas inspects its 76 state-licensed beds; CMS inspects its 74 nursing-home beds.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each covers only its own beds, visits and dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In Texas, the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is the primary regulatory body that conducts unannounced inspections and publishes quality reports for all long-term care homes.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Texas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. TX average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 At Avg
Metrics at Texas average:
• Inspections with citations (at TX avg) 3 Better Metrics better than Texas average:
• Total citations (86% below)
• Life safety citations (33% below)
• Enforcement actions (100% below)
• Inspections with citations (at TX avg) 3 Better Metrics better than Texas average:
• Total citations (86% below)
• Life safety citations (33% below)
• Enforcement actions (100% below)
Citations
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 1 | 7.0 | This facility has 86% fewer total citations than a typical Texas nursing home (1 vs. TX avg 7).↓ 86% better |
|
Life safety citations
Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 4 | 6.0 | This facility has 33% fewer life safety citations than a typical Texas nursing home (4 vs. TX avg 6).↓ 33% better |
|
Enforcement actions
Formal penalties the state issued against this facility. In Texas these are administrative penalties, recorded by the Health and Human Services Commission.
| 0 | 0.2 | This facility has 100% fewer enforcement actions than a typical Texas nursing home (0 vs. TX avg 0.2).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 1 | 1.0 | This facility has inspections with citations in line with the Texas average (1 vs. TX avg 1).— At avg |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
11
↑ 38% · TX 8This facility: 11, 38% above the Texas average of 8 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
40
Rank #192 / 234Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 192nd out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Texas State average, with a ranking across all 234 TX facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 43% · TX 28This facility: 40, 43% above the Texas average of 28 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.64
Rank #159 / 234Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 159th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Texas mean across 234 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.≈ 0% · TX 3.65This facility: 3.64, level with the Texas average of 3.65 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
40 of 40 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · TX 1.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 1.8 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
40
↑ 57% · TX 25.4This facility: 40, 57% above the Texas average of 25.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 16, 2026 · 1 citation (Care Planning, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 10 of 40 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 16, 2026
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 05, 2026
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 29, 2026
11 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 14, 2025
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 18, 2025
3 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 13, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 08, 2025
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 16, 2024
5 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 27, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 15, 2024
5 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 24, 2023
9 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 40 citations
Quality of Life & Care
10 deficiencies (25%)
Resident Rights
9 deficiencies (23%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
8 deficiencies (20%)
Nutrition & Dietary
6 deficiencies (15%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (8%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (3%)
Administration
1 deficiency (3%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (3%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
25 of 40 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 15 of 40 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
TX avg $63KTexas average: $63,404. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
TX avg 2.1Texas average: 2.1. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
TX avg 0.18Texas average: 0.18. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Texas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 2% · TX 7.6This facility: 7.5, 2% below the TX average of 7.6 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
16.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 22% · TX 13.8This facility: 16.8, 22% above the TX average of 13.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 4 better, 5 worse, 2 near TX average
3 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 near TX average
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.9%
↓ 12% · TX 15.8This facility: 13.9, 12% below the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.9%
↓ 12% · TX 15.8This facility: 13.9, 12% below the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.5%
↑ 20% · TX 12.9This facility: 15.5, 20% above the TX average of 12.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.5%
↑ 20% · TX 12.9This facility: 15.5, 20% above the TX average of 12.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.2%
↑ 69% · TX 12.5This facility: 21.2, 69% above the TX average of 12.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.2%
↑ 69% · TX 12.5This facility: 21.2, 69% above the TX average of 12.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
↑ 88% · TX 0.8This facility: 1.5, 88% above the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
↑ 88% · TX 0.8This facility: 1.5, 88% above the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
↓ 85% · TX 3.2This facility: 0.5, 85% below the TX average of 3.2 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
↓ 85% · TX 3.2This facility: 0.5, 85% below the TX average of 3.2 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.9%
↑ 60% · TX 3.7This facility: 5.9, 60% above the TX average of 3.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.9%
↑ 60% · TX 3.7This facility: 5.9, 60% above the TX average of 3.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.8%
↓ 38% · TX 2.9This facility: 1.8, 38% below the TX average of 2.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.8%
↓ 38% · TX 2.9This facility: 1.8, 38% below the TX average of 2.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 2.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 2.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 2.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 2.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.3%
↑ 25% · TX 9.8This facility: 12.3, 25% above the TX average of 9.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.3%
↑ 25% · TX 9.8This facility: 12.3, 25% above the TX average of 9.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.0%
↑ 2% · TX 96.3This facility: 98.0, 2% above the TX average of 96.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.0%
↑ 2% · TX 96.3This facility: 98.0, 2% above the TX average of 96.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4%
↓ 1% · TX 97.0This facility: 96.4, 1% below the TX average of 97.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4%
↓ 1% · TX 97.0This facility: 96.4, 1% below the TX average of 97.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
↓ 81% · TX 1.4This facility: 0.3, 81% below the TX average of 1.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
↓ 81% · TX 1.4This facility: 0.3, 81% below the TX average of 1.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.3%
↑ 1% · TX 88.7This facility: 89.3, 1% above the TX average of 88.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.3%
↑ 1% · TX 88.7This facility: 89.3, 1% above the TX average of 88.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.5%
↑ 5% · TX 85.4This facility: 89.5, 5% above the TX average of 85.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.5%
↑ 5% · TX 85.4This facility: 89.5, 5% above the TX average of 85.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending 2023. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY 2023
Latest cost report is for the fiscal year ending 2023, older than most Texas homes. Rankings are not shown because peers report different years.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−41.9% operating margin
+26.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Texas homes
82.4% payroll share of revenue
TX average 68.8%
Payroll rose $0.4M while revenue rose $1.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2023 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2023 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Texas homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2023 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2023Trend | TX median | Compared with TX homesRank in TX | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $7.5M | +$1.1M | Trend 20162023 | TX median $9.3M | Rank in TX Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $10.6M | −$0.2M | Trend 20162023 | TX median $9.8M | Rank in TX Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$3.1M | +$1.3M | Trend 20162023 | TX median −$0.4M | Rank in TX Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −41.9% | +26.9 pts | Trend 20162023 | TX median −5.0% | Rank in TX Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$1.3M | +$1.6M | Trend — | TX median $0.3M | Rank in TX Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Texas homes
| Metric | FY 2023 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2023Trend | TX median | Compared with TX homesRank in TX | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.2M | +$0.4M | Trend 20162023 | TX median $4.9M | Rank in TX Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 82.4% | −7.2 pts | Trend 20162023 | TX median 57.6% | Rank in TX Not ranked | 13.6 pts over TX average The TX average is 68.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2023 2 charts · TX benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Texas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin TX payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2016–2023 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.2M | $9.5M | $10.1M | $8.4M | $7.6M | $6.7M | $6.4M | $7.5M |
| Operating expenses | $8.5M | $10.0M | $10.6M | $10.5M | $10.1M | $9.8M | $10.8M | $10.6M |
| Net patient income | −$0.3M | −$0.4M | −$0.5M | −$2.1M | −$2.5M | −$3.1M | −$4.4M | −$3.1M |
| Operating margin | −3.3% | −4.5% | −5.0% | −24.4% | −33.1% | −45.4% | −68.8% | −41.9% |
| Net income | −$0.1M | −$0.1M | −$0.8M | −$0.3M | −$0.6M | −$1.5M | −$2.9M | −$1.3M |
| Payroll costs | $4.1M | $4.9M | $5.3M | $5.5M | $5.5M | $5.6M | $5.7M | $6.2M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 49.7% | 51.6% | 52.7% | 65.7% | 72.5% | 83.8% | 89.6% | 82.4% |
| Beds | 94 | 108 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 104 |
| Gross revenue | $11.9M | $13.1M | $14.2M | $12.6M | $11.5M | $10.7M | $10.5M | $13.5M |
| Salaries | $3.4M | $4.2M | $4.7M | $4.9M | $4.8M | $4.9M | $5.0M | $5.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.8M |
| Contract labor | $0.7M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.5M | $0.1M | $0.0M | $0.1M |
| Other operating costs | $4.4M | $5.0M | $5.3M | $4.9M | $4.6M | $4.1M | $5.1M | $4.4M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $269 | $284 | $241 | $194 | $199 | $196 | $199 | $233 |
| Cost per day | $278 | $297 | $253 | $242 | $265 | $285 | $336 | $331 |
| Average length of stay | 50.4 days | 51.2 days | 38.3 days | 59.0 days | 62.5 days | 63.4 days | 61.6 days | 49.8 days |
Showing 2023–2021 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
407 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
91 · 22%
Medicaid
85 · 21%
Private pay & other
231 · 57%
Resident snapshot
33 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
1 · 3%
Medicaid
32 · 97%
Private pay & other
0 · 0%
Leaving
473 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
74 · 16%
Medicaid
113 · 24%
Private pay & other
286 · 60%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Good Samaritan Society – White Acres
7.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from El Paso's city center to Good Samaritan Society – White Acres's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 2.62 miles to nearest hospital (Consultorio)
Calculate Travel Distance to Good Samaritan Society – White Acres
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around El Paso
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the TX Health & Human Services Commission (HHSC), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Texas average is: 68.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mountain Villa Nursing Center | NH SNF | El Paso (Military Heights) | 48
Facility
48
TX AVG
121
Rank
#243 / 258 |
85.0%
Facility
85.0%
TX AVG
72.9%
Rank
#47 / 178 | +17% | 2.93
Facility
2.93
TX AVG
3.47
Rank
#194 / 233 | -12% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$63.8k
Rank
#1 / 236 | 23
Facility
23
TX AVG
28.0
Rank
#108 / 234 | 4.6
Facility
4.6
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#208 / 234 | - | 41 | - |
70
Facility
70
TX AVG
44
Rank
#37 / 276 | Maharlika Resources, Inc | $2.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$10.2M
Rank
#221 / 225 | $2.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$5.8M
Rank
#200 / 225 | 71.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
71.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
68.8%
Rank
#34 / 202 | 675768 | ||||
| Good Samaritan Society – White Acres | NH ADC AL HC HOS IL MC RC | El Paso (Northwest El Paso) | 150
Facility
150
TX AVG
121
Rank
#46 / 258 |
84.1%
Facility
84.1%
TX AVG
72.9%
Rank
#49 / 178 | +15% | 3.39
Facility
3.39
TX AVG
3.47
Rank
#110 / 233 | +24% | -2% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$63.8k
Rank
#1 / 236 | 40
Facility
40
TX AVG
28.0
Rank
#192 / 234 | 3.6
Facility
3.6
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#159 / 234 | - | 62 | A+ |
20
Facility
20
TX AVG
44
Rank
#235 / 276 | White Acres Assisted Living LLC | $7.5M*Fiscal year ending 10/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $6.2M*Fiscal year ending 10/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 82.4%*Fiscal year ending 10/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 675025 | ||||
| Vista Hills Health Care Center | NH MC SNF | El Paso (Vista De Oro) | 120
Facility
120
TX AVG
121
Rank
#125 / 258 |
69.9%
Facility
69.9%
TX AVG
72.9%
Rank
#109 / 178 | -4% | 3.40
Facility
3.40
TX AVG
3.47
Rank
#110 / 233 | +7% | -2% | $40.5k
Facility
$40.5k
TX AVG
$63.8k
Rank
#167 / 236 | 64
Facility
64
TX AVG
28.0
Rank
#229 / 234 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#173 / 234 | 1 | 84 | A+ |
51
Facility
51
TX AVG
44
Rank
#100 / 276 | El Paso Viii Enterprises, LLC | $7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$10.2M
Rank
#162 / 225 | $4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$5.8M
Rank
#134 / 225 | 63.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
63.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
68.8%
Rank
#58 / 202 | 455493 | ||||
| Franklin Heights Nursing and Rehab Center | NH SNF | El Paso (Northwest El Paso) | 132
Facility
132
TX AVG
121
Rank
#79 / 258 |
68.9%
Facility
68.9%
TX AVG
72.9%
Rank
#113 / 178 | -5% | 3.45
Facility
3.45
TX AVG
3.47
Rank
#110 / 233 | +6% | -1% | $191.5k
Facility
$191.5k
TX AVG
$63.8k
Rank
#228 / 236 | 73
Facility
73
TX AVG
28.0
Rank
#233 / 234 | 5.6
Facility
5.6
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#228 / 234 | 5 | 91 | A+ |
51
Facility
51
TX AVG
44
Rank
#100 / 276 | West Wharton County Hospital District | $8.5MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$8.5MFiscal year ending 03/2025
TX AVG
$10.2M
Rank
#135 / 225 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 03/2025
TX AVG
$5.8M
Rank
#125 / 225 | 56.1%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
56.1%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
TX AVG
68.8%
Rank
#109 / 202 | 675479 | ||||
| Pebble Creek Nursing Center | NH SNF | El Paso (East El Paso) | 120
Facility
120
TX AVG
121
Rank
#125 / 258 |
80.0%
Facility
80.0%
TX AVG
72.9%
Rank
#61 / 178 | +10% | 3.11
Facility
3.11
TX AVG
3.47
Rank
#156 / 233 | +20% | -11% | $145.2k
Facility
$145.2k
TX AVG
$63.8k
Rank
#218 / 236 | 58
Facility
58
TX AVG
28.0
Rank
#224 / 234 | 4.1
Facility
4.1
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#191 / 234 | 4 | 96 | A+ |
73
Facility
73
TX AVG
44
Rank
#24 / 276 | El Paso V Enterprises, L.l.c | $8.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$10.2M
Rank
#129 / 225 | $4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$5.8M
Rank
#130 / 225 | 52.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
52.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
68.8%
Rank
#130 / 202 | 455718 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other TX nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Texas
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres is in El Paso, Texas. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
Texas VA Aid and Attendance/Housebound
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- Countable income must be below the applicable Maximum Annual Pension Rate (MAPR); the rate depends on dependents and benefit category; Qualifying unreimbursed medical expenses may reduce countable income.
- Asset limit
- VA pension net-worth limit is $163,699 from December 1 2025 through November 30 2026; net worth includes countable assets and annual income under VA rules.
Eligibility
- General
- Additional pension benefits for qualifying Veterans or survivors who satisfy VA pension eligibility and the medical requirements for Aid and Attendance or Housebound status; being an older veteran or spouse alone does not qualify.
- TX specifics
- This is a federal VA benefit rather than a state-specific grant; Aid and Attendance and Housebound benefits cannot be received together.
What it provides
- Increased monthly VA pension based on the applicable MAPR less countable income.
STAR+PLUS and STAR+PLUS HCBS
Texas STAR+PLUS and STAR+PLUS HCBS
- Who it is for
- Texas Medicaid members, mainly adults 65+ or with disabilities, who need long-term services and supports
Eligibility
- General
- Texas Medicaid applicants or members who meet a STAR+PLUS eligibility pathway; the program principally serves adults with disabilities and adults age 65 or older. STAR+PLUS HCBS requires a separate assessment for nursing-facility-level needs.
- TX specifics
- Health plans and participating providers depend on the service area. Assisted living and adult foster care are additional HCBS services for approved enrollees; members remain responsible for room and board and any assessed copayment.
What it provides
- STAR+PLUS provides Medicaid health coverage and authorized long-term services and supports.
- Approved STAR+PLUS HCBS plans may include personal assistance or assisted living services.
- Other assessed HCBS benefits include respite and nursing services and home modifications.
Texas Community Care Services (CCAD)
Texas Community Care for the Aged and Disabled / Community Care Services
- Who it is for
- Texans who need community-care services assessed under the HHS Community Care handbook
Eligibility
- General
- Texas Community Care for the Aged and Disabled is an umbrella for community-care services with service-specific eligibility.
- TX specifics
- Individual services are administered under the Community Care Services Eligibility Handbook.
What it provides
- Community care services depend on the specific program and assessed need.
Area Agency on Aging (AAA) Services
Texas AAA Services
- Who it is for
- People 60+ in Texas and their family members and caregivers
- Income limit
- Services prioritize greatest economic and social need.
Eligibility
- General
- Texas Area Agencies on Aging help people age 60 or older and their family members and caregivers.
- TX specifics
- Texas has 28 Area Agencies on Aging; assistance and services are obtained through the local agency.
What it provides
- Information and referrals; benefits counseling and legal assistance; care coordination; caregiver support; in-home support; nutrition and ombudsman services.
Family Caregiver Support Program (FCSP)
Texas Family Caregiver Support Program
- Who it is for
- Family or informal caregivers of an adult 60+ or of someone of any age with dementia
- Income limit
- Federal program prioritizes greatest economic and social need.
Eligibility
- General
- Texas AAA caregiver support serves eligible caregivers of older adults; particular service eligibility follows the relevant program and assessment.
- TX specifics
- Available through the 28 Area Agencies on Aging with priority to greatest economic and social need.
What it provides
- Caregiver information assistance and support; respite and other services depend on local availability and assessment.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Texas Medicare Savings Program
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
- Income limit
- effective March 1 2026 · Individual QMB maximum $1,330 per month; SLMB range $1,330.01 to less than $1,596; QI-1 range $1,596 to less than $1,796; These published bases exclude the $20 general income disregard; couple and spousal-deeming rules differ.
- Asset limit
- 2026 · Countable resources up to $9,950 individual or $14,910 couple for QMB SLMB and QI-1; exclusions apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Texas applicant entitled to Medicare Part A or enrolled in qualifying Part B-ID coverage and meeting applicable MSP criteria.
- TX specifics
- QI-1 is unavailable with other Medicaid-funded coverage; Part B-ID applicants have special limited-benefit rules.
What it provides
- QMB pays qualifying Medicare premiums deductibles and coinsurance; SLMB and QI-1 pay Part B or B-ID premiums only.
Comprehensive Energy Assistance Program (CEAP)
Texas Comprehensive Energy Assistance Program (CEAP)
- Who it is for
- Low-income Texas households that need help with utility bills
Eligibility
- General
- Qualifying low-income Texas households apply through local Comprehensive Energy Assistance Program providers.
- TX specifics
- Texas LIHEAP utility assistance operates through CEAP.
What it provides
- Utility assistance through CEAP.
Property Tax Exemption for Seniors
Texas Senior Property Tax Exemption
- Who it is for
- Texas homeowners 65+, or qualifying disabled homeowners, living in their homestead
Eligibility
- General
- Residence-homestead owner age 65 or older who uses the property as a principal residence; qualifying disabled homeowners and certain surviving spouses have related provisions.
- TX specifics
- School districts must provide an additional $60,000 age-65-or-disabled residence-homestead exemption; Local-option exemptions and tax-ceiling rules are separate.
What it provides
- Reduction in taxable residence-homestead value (additional $60,000 school-district exemption for age 65 or qualifying disability); actual tax savings vary.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Good Samaritan Society – White Acres
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Good Samaritan Society – White Acres in?
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres is in the Northwest El Paso neighborhood of El Paso.
02 Who is the owner of Good Samaritan Society – White Acres?
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres is legally operated by White Acres Assisted Living LLC.
03 Is Good Samaritan Society – White Acres in a walkable area?
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres has a walk score of 20. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Good Samaritan Society – White Acres?
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres's occupancy is 84.1%.
05 How long has Good Samaritan Society – White Acres been in business?
Good Samaritan Society – White Acres has been operating for approximately 43 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Good Samaritan Society – White Acres?
No, Good Samaritan Society – White Acres has a no-pet policy.
07 What is the best email address for Good Samaritan Society – White Acres?
The team at Good Samaritan Society – White Acres can be reached at 1557504coordinator@good-sam.com.
Updated on
