Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
117
95 employees · 22 contractors · 32 on an average day Lincoln Lane Villa
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Hendricks, MN
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Lincoln Lane Villa
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Hendricks, MN
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Peacefully situated in Hendricks, MN, Lincoln Lane Villa is a blissful community that offers assisted living. The community is dedicated to residents’ welfare, providing high-quality support for their daily living activities 24/7. Here, residents do not have to worry about their household responsibilities with housekeeping and laundry services.
Recreational activities and engaging programs are conducted to improve residents’ living experiences and cognition. With thoughtfully planned meal options, residents have a hassle-free dining experience that caters to their dietary needs and preferences. Transportation is also provided, so residents can travel conveniently and safely. The community is a good option for those seeking quality care in retirement, especially with its nurturing setting and state-of-the-art amenities.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 33m
This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 33mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +33% above Minnesota average
4 of 6 metrics below Minnesota average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 7 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
7 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
59m
↓ 19% · MN 1h 13mThis facility: 59m per resident per day, 19% below the Minnesota average of 1h 13m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 7 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
7 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 6 total: 5 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
6 staff · 9.9-hour shifts
40m
↓ 6% · MN 42mThis facility: 40m per resident per day, 6% below the Minnesota average of 42m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 6 total: 5 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
6 staff · 9.9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 56 total: 53 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
56 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
3h 54m
↑ 33% · MN 2h 55mThis facility: 3h 54m per resident per day, 33% above the Minnesota average of 2h 55m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 56 total: 53 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
56 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 1 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
1 staff · 4.4-hour shifts
1m
↓ 84% · MN 5mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 84% below the Minnesota average of 5m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 1 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
1 staff · 4.4-hour shiftsUS average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 37m
↑ 9% · MN 4h 13mThis facility: 4h 37m per resident per day, 9% above the Minnesota average of 4h 13m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
18m
↓ 56% · MN 42mThis facility: 18m per resident per day, 56% below the Minnesota average of 42m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
117
95 employees · 22 contractors · 32 on an average day
117 total staff / 47 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.49 : 1
↑ 14% · MN 2.18This facility: 2.49 staff per resident, 14% above the Minnesota average of 2.18 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
117 staff ÷ 47 residents
See full Minnesota ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↓ 1% · MN 7.5 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 1% below the Minnesota average of 7.5 h (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
21,637 staff hours this quarter
See full Minnesota ranking →89.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Minnesota average: 90.3% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (6), Physical Therapy Aide (4), Certified Nursing Assistant (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Qualified Social Worker (1), Registered Nurse (1), Licensed Practical Nurse (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
16
Rank #91 / 94Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 91st out of 94 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
16
Rank #91 / 94Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 91st out of 94 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #84 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #84 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
23
/ 100
About This Community
StatusApproved
CountyLincoln
Resident Council
Family Council
CNA Training Program
Short-Term Rehab
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Housekeeping
Minimum Age55
Building TypeSingle-story
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Minnesota, the Department of Health, Health Regulation Division is the primary authority for conducting onsite inspections and reporting on the quality of care in residential facilities.
Since 2025 · 1 year of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 17 deficiencies 1 inspection
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 17 deficiencies 1 inspection
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Minnesota state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2025 vs. Minnesota state average
Overall vs. MN average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Minnesota average:
• Total deficiencies (70% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (65% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
• Total deficiencies (70% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (65% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | MN Average | vs. MN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 17 | 10.0 | This facility has 70% more total deficiencies than a typical Minnesota nursing home (17 vs. MN avg 10).↑ 70% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 17.0 | 10.3 | This facility has 65% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Minnesota nursing home (17 vs. MN avg 10.3).↑ 65% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | MN Average | vs. MN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 1 | 1.0 | This facility has total inspections in line with the Minnesota average (1 vs. MN avg 1).— At avg |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
3
↓ 49% · MN 5.9This facility: 3, 49% below the MN average of 5.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
26
Rank #31 / 66Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 31st out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Minnesota State average, with a ranking across all 66 MN facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 11% · MN 23.4This facility: 26, 11% above the MN average of 23.4 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
8.67
Rank #65 / 66Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Minnesota mean across 66 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 121% · MN 3.92This facility: 8.67, 121% above the MN average of 3.92 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
61% corrected
16 of 26 citations corrected · 10 still open
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the MN average of 0.7 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the MN average of 0.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
26
↑ 22% · MN 21.3This facility: 26, 22% above the MN average of 21.3 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
61% corrected · 10 open
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the MN average of 0.7 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 25, 2026 · 9 citations, 0 corrected
Most cited category: Administration, 7 of 26 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 25, 2026
9 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Administration moderate citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Apr 30, 2025
8 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 30, 2024
9 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 26 citations
Administration
7 deficiencies (27%)
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (15%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (15%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (15%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (8%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (8%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (8%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
25 of 26 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 26 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
MN avg $50KMinnesota average: $49,948. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MN avg 1.84Minnesota average: 1.84. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MN avg 0.4Minnesota average: 0.4. Average among the 156 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Minnesota average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 33% · MN 10.3This facility: 13.8, 33% above the MN average of 10.3 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
25.4
Score · lower is better
↑ 21% · MN 21.0This facility: 25.4, 21% above the MN average of 21.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 2 better, 7 worse, 2 near MN average
2 short-stay measures: 2 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.5%
↑ 29% · MN 18.2This facility: 23.5, 29% above the MN average of 18.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.5%
↑ 29% · MN 18.2This facility: 23.5, 29% above the MN average of 18.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.4%
↓ 11% · MN 20.5This facility: 18.4, 11% below the MN average of 20.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.4%
↓ 11% · MN 20.5This facility: 18.4, 11% below the MN average of 20.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.4%
↑ 41% · MN 24.5This facility: 34.4, 41% above the MN average of 24.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.4%
↑ 41% · MN 24.5This facility: 34.4, 41% above the MN average of 24.5 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.4%
↑ 188% · MN 2.6This facility: 7.4, 188% above the MN average of 2.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.4%
↑ 188% · MN 2.6This facility: 7.4, 188% above the MN average of 2.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
14.6%
↑ 268% · MN 4.0This facility: 14.6, 268% above the MN average of 4.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
14.6%
↑ 268% · MN 4.0This facility: 14.6, 268% above the MN average of 4.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.3%
↑ 41% · MN 5.2This facility: 7.3, 41% above the MN average of 5.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.3%
↑ 41% · MN 5.2This facility: 7.3, 41% above the MN average of 5.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1%
↑ 27% · MN 4.1This facility: 5.1, 27% above the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1%
↑ 27% · MN 4.1This facility: 5.1, 27% above the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6%
↓ 85% · MN 4.1This facility: 0.6, 85% below the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6%
↓ 85% · MN 4.1This facility: 0.6, 85% below the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.7%
↑ 9% · MN 17.1This facility: 18.7, 9% above the MN average of 17.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.7%
↑ 9% · MN 17.1This facility: 18.7, 9% above the MN average of 17.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · MN 97.4This facility: 100.0, 3% above the MN average of 97.4 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · MN 97.4This facility: 100.0, 3% above the MN average of 97.4 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7%
↑ 2% · MN 96.1This facility: 97.7, 2% above the MN average of 96.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7%
↑ 2% · MN 96.1This facility: 97.7, 2% above the MN average of 96.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 2 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MN 1.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MN average of 1.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MN 1.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MN average of 1.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 14% · MN 88.1This facility: 100.0, 14% above the MN average of 88.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 14% · MN 88.1This facility: 100.0, 14% above the MN average of 88.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Resident snapshot
47 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
1 · 2%
Medicaid
27 · 57%
Private pay & other
19 · 40%
Places of interest near Lincoln Lane Villa
0.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Hendricks's city center to Lincoln Lane Villa's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Lincoln Lane Villa
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MN Dept. of Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Minnesota average is: 72.0% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trillium Woods | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Plymouth (Glacier Vista) | 44
Facility
44
MN AVG
88
Rank
#75 / 94 |
88.6%
Facility
88.6%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#45 / 61 | +13% | 6.52
Facility
6.52
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#7 / 63 | +8% | +35% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 6
Facility
6
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#5 / 66 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#14 / 66 | - | 39 | A+ |
4
Facility
4
MN AVG
49
Rank
#103 / 104 | Lcs Trillium Woods Jv LLC | $3.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#61 / 62 | $9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#20 / 62 | 280.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
280.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#1 / 62 | 245627 | ||||
| Folkestone | NH AL IL MC SNF | Wayzata | 90
Facility
90
MN AVG
88
Rank
#34 / 94 | - | - | 5.44
Facility
5.44
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#13 / 63 | -24% | +13% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 9
Facility
9
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#10 / 66 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#14 / 66 | - | 27 | - |
53
Facility
53
MN AVG
49
Rank
#52 / 104 | Mark Specht | $4.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$4.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#59 / 62 | $8.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$8.3MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#25 / 62 | 187.8%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
187.8%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#3 / 62 | 245621 | ||||
| Annandale Care Center | NH AL IL MC SNF | East Annandale | 120
Facility
120
MN AVG
88
Rank
#20 / 94 | - | - | 4.67
Facility
4.67
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#37 / 63 | -41% | -4% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 5
Facility
5
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#4 / 66 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#1 / 66 | 1 | 40 | - |
62
Facility
62
MN AVG
49
Rank
#33 / 104 | Richard Feeney | $6.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$6.4MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#48 / 62 | $7.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$7.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#28 / 62 | 121.9%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
121.9%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#4 / 62 | 245364 | ||||
| Mission Nursing Home | NH SNF | Plymouth (Mission Farms) | 70
Facility
70
MN AVG
88
Rank
#49 / 94 |
90.7%
Facility
90.7%
MN AVG
78.4%
Rank
#22 / 61 | +16% | 4.94
Facility
4.94
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#63 / 63 | +52% | +2% | $14.0k
Facility
$14.0k
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#36 / 66 | 33
Facility
33
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#43 / 66 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#14 / 66 | 2 | 64 | - |
6
Facility
6
MN AVG
49
Rank
#100 / 104 | Missions, Inc Programs | $8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$12.9M
Rank
#41 / 62 | $5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
$8.4M
Rank
#40 / 62 | 73.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
73.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MN AVG
72%
Rank
#16 / 62 | 245546 | ||||
| Lincoln Lane Villa | NH AL HC HOS SNF | Hendricks | 16
Facility
16
MN AVG
88
Rank
#91 / 94 | - | - | 5.55
Facility
5.55
MN AVG
4.84
Rank
#39 / 63 | -58% | +15% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$55.1k
Rank
#1 / 66 | 26
Facility
26
MN AVG
23.4
Rank
#31 / 66 | 8.7
Facility
8.7
MN AVG
3.9
Rank
#65 / 66 | - | 48 | - |
23
Facility
23
MN AVG
49
Rank
#84 / 104 | - | - | - | - | 245467 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MN nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Lincoln Lane Villa
Is Lincoln Lane Villa in a walkable area?
Lincoln Lane Villa has a walk score of 23. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Are pets allowed at Lincoln Lane Villa?
No, Lincoln Lane Villa has a no-pet policy.
Does Lincoln Lane Villa operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Lincoln Lane Villa is registered as a non-profit in MN.
What is the overall rating for Lincoln Lane Villa?
Lincoln Lane Villa received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does Lincoln Lane Villa have?
Lincoln Lane Villa has 16 beds.
Has Lincoln Lane Villa had any deficiencies?
Lincoln Lane Villa has had 17 reported deficiencies according to records from Minnesota Dept. of Human Services (DHS).
What levels of care does Lincoln Lane Villa provide?
Lincoln Lane Villa offers Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Home Care, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
