1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Start your healing journey with the trusted senior living community of Providence Place in 23rd Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN, specializing in memory care, transitional care, and skilled nursing. With a wide array of therapy services including physical, occupational, speech, and cognitive therapy, the community ensures seniors get better every day. A team of experienced and highly trained professionals lends extra hands for seniors to thrive and live to their potential.
The community fosters a bright and welcoming environment, empowering residents to enjoy every moment of their best years. Focusing on residents’ preferences, the community works hard to provide care and assistance tailored to their every need. Providence Place is a safe place for relaxation and security with its top-notch services and specially designed amenities.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 78th out of 89 homes in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 43m per day | ▼ 33% State avg: 1h 4m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 2m per day | ▼ 94% State avg: 37m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 10m per day | ▼ 93% State avg: 2h 33m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 48m per day | ▼ 78% State avg: 3h 41m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 3m per day | ▼ 31% State avg: 4m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 42m per day | ▲ 4% State avg: 41m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
In Minnesota, the Department of Health, Health Regulation Division is the primary authority for conducting onsite inspections and reporting on the quality of care in residential facilities.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Minnesota state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | MN Average | vs. MN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 58 | 10 | This facility has 480% more total deficiencies than a typical Minnesota nursing home (58 vs. MN avg 10).↑ 480% worse |
|
Deficiencies per year
Average deficiencies per year since 2023.
| 19.3 | 3.3 | This facility has 485% more deficiencies per year than a typical Minnesota nursing home (19.3 vs. MN avg 3.3).↑ 485% worse |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
Minnesota average 6
Last Health inspection on May 2025
Minnesota average 23.2
Minnesota average 3.76
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
27 of 46 citations resulted from standard inspections; 15 of 46 resulted from complaint investigations; and 4 of 46 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
186% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 0.7
300% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 0.5
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
78% fewer staff per resident than Minnesota average
19% better than Minnesota average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 20 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
20
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
11 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 1 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
1
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.7 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
6 total: 5 full-time employees and 1 contractor.
6
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
10 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
3,348 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Registered Nurse | 20 | 0 | 20 | 8,586 | 92 | 100% | 11 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 7 | 0 | 7 | 2,991 | 88 | 96% | 7.7 |
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 5 | 1 | 6 | 2,453 | 91 | 99% | 10 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1,715 | 64 | 70% | 7.9 |
| Dental Services Staff | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,328 | 69 | 75% | 8.6 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 3 | 3 | 753 | 64 | 70% | 6.6 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 6 | 6 | 663 | 66 | 72% | 6.4 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 1 | 0 | 1 | 543 | 56 | 61% | 9.7 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 2 | 2 | 500 | 61 | 66% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 5 | 5 | 468 | 63 | 68% | 7.1 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 428 | 57 | 62% | 7.5 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 428 | 57 | 62% | 7.5 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 4 | 4 | 425 | 58 | 63% | 7.2 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 60 | 8 | 9% | 7.5 |
Includes penalties issued in 2023-2025
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
241% higher than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: $44K
149% more fines than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 2.0
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 0.4
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
4 penalties in the past 3 years
Multiple penalties were reported in the last 3 years.
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Apr 14, 2025
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Feb 27, 2025
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Oct 2, 2023
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Aug 3, 2023Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
8.2
27% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 11.1
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
17.7
22% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 22.6
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.0%
26% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 18.9%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.2%
28% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 23.8%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.8%
13% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 25.0%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
5% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 3.7%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
46% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 5.4%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
18% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 2.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.1%
25% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 4.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4%
45% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 4.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.7%
15% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 17.2%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.6%
In line with Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 97.3%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
In line with Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 96.0%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.02
21% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 1.67
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.12
7% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 1.99
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.1%
16% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 88.9%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
67% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 1.9%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.4%
20% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 82.6%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.6%
In line with Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 23.1%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.3%
12% better than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 14.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
2.6%
232% worse than Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
51.6%
In line with Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
49.1%
In line with Minnesota averageMinnesota average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
22% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
50% of new residents, often for short stays.
29% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
138Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Providence Place from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #25 / 89Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 25th out of 89 homes in Minnesota. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Minnesota average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Ranking totals vary by category as each rank only includes facilities that report data for that metric. Homes missing that data point aren't included in the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #70 / 89Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 70th out of 89 homes in Minnesota. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the Minnesota average. Well-run Minnesota facilities typically land around 61–68% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Ranking totals vary by category as each rank only includes facilities that report data for that metric. Homes missing that data point aren't included in the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Building Type: 3-story
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (50% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 4 - 5 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
Galina Knop is the Executive Director, Owner, and Founder of Providence Place. She brings a deeply personal commitment to dementia care, shaped by her own experience as a family caregiver. Galina has dedicated nearly 30 years to providing individualized, compassionate care for elders with memory impairment, ensuring their needs and those of their families are met with respect and dignity.
3.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Minneapolis's city center to Providence Place's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 1.65 miles to nearest hospital (Abbott Northwestern's Joint Replacement Center)
Add your location
The information below is reported by the Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division.
| Redeemer Health Care Center | NH HC PC RC | Minneapolis (Powderhorn) | 119
Facility
119
MN AVG
61
Rank
#78 / 532 |
93.9%
Facility
93.9%
MN AVG
79.7%
Rank
#47 / 331 | +18% | 5.23
Facility
5.23
MN AVG
4.77
Rank
#20 / 89 | -28% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$47.9k
Rank
#1 / 90 | 25
Facility
25
MN AVG
23.2
Rank
#45 / 90 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
MN AVG
3.8
Rank
#67 / 90 | - | 112 | - |
95
Facility
95
MN AVG
43
Rank
#3 / 632 | Danny Colgan | $15.5M
Facility
$15.5M
MN AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#31 / 89 | $9.9M
Facility
$9.9M
MN AVG
$4.9M
Rank
#21 / 89 | 63.5%
Facility
63.5%
MN AVG
50.7%
Rank
#29 / 89 | 245520 | ||||
| Jones-Harrison Senior Living | NH AL MC NC | Minneapolis (Calhoun Isles) | 53
Facility
53
MN AVG
61
Rank
#249 / 532 |
92.5%
Facility
92.5%
MN AVG
79.7%
Rank
#59 / 331 | +16% | 5.11
Facility
5.11
MN AVG
4.77
Rank
#26 / 89 | +38% | +7% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$47.9k
Rank
#1 / 90 | 35
Facility
35
MN AVG
23.2
Rank
#65 / 90 | 4.4
Facility
4.4
MN AVG
3.8
Rank
#58 / 90 | - | 49 | - |
56
Facility
56
MN AVG
43
Rank
#212 / 632 | Marcia Diracles | $13.5M
Facility
$13.5M
MN AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#26 / 89 | $12.2M
Facility
$12.2M
MN AVG
$4.9M
Rank
#15 / 89 | 90.4%
Facility
90.4%
MN AVG
50.7%
Rank
#14 / 89 | 245460 | ||||
| The Villas at Bryn Mawr | NH AL | Minneapolis (Harrison) | 105
Facility
105
MN AVG
61
Rank
#112 / 532 |
75.0%
Facility
75.0%
MN AVG
79.7%
Rank
#188 / 331 | -6% | 3.73
Facility
3.73
MN AVG
4.77
Rank
#81 / 89 | -68% | -22% | $35.3k
Facility
$35.3k
MN AVG
$47.9k
Rank
#66 / 90 | 58
Facility
58
MN AVG
23.2
Rank
#85 / 90 | 5.3
Facility
5.3
MN AVG
3.8
Rank
#71 / 90 | 4 | 99 | - |
55
Facility
55
MN AVG
43
Rank
#217 / 632 | - | $9.0M
Facility
$9.0M
MN AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#59 / 89 | $4.8M
Facility
$4.8M
MN AVG
$4.9M
Rank
#52 / 89 | 53.8%
Facility
53.8%
MN AVG
50.7%
Rank
#38 / 89 | 245203 | ||||
| Lakehouse Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | NH HC MC RC | Minneapolis (Southwest Minneapolis) | 260
Facility
260
MN AVG
61
Rank
#6 / 532 |
80.9%
Facility
80.9%
MN AVG
79.7%
Rank
#139 / 331 | +2% | 3.91
Facility
3.91
MN AVG
4.77
Rank
#69 / 89 | -24% | -18% | $0
Facility
$0
MN AVG
$47.9k
Rank
#1 / 90 | 76
Facility
76
MN AVG
23.2
Rank
#88 / 90 | 5.1
Facility
5.1
MN AVG
3.8
Rank
#70 / 90 | 1 | 224 | - |
81
Facility
81
MN AVG
43
Rank
#36 / 632 | Lake Harriet Operator Holdings LLC | $20.0M
Facility
$20.0M
MN AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#20 / 89 | $10.7M
Facility
$10.7M
MN AVG
$4.9M
Rank
#19 / 89 | 53.6%
Facility
53.6%
MN AVG
50.7%
Rank
#62 / 89 | 245055 | ||||
| Providence Place | NH HC MC | Minneapolis (Standish) | 190
Facility
190
MN AVG
61
Rank
#12 / 532 |
81.6%
Facility
81.6%
MN AVG
79.7%
Rank
#137 / 331 | +2% | 3.79
Facility
3.79
MN AVG
4.77
Rank
#78 / 89 | +117% | -21% | $136.5k
Facility
$136.5k
MN AVG
$47.9k
Rank
#86 / 90 | 46
Facility
46
MN AVG
23.2
Rank
#78 / 90 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
MN AVG
3.8
Rank
#45 / 90 | 4 | 157 | - |
72
Facility
72
MN AVG
43
Rank
#102 / 632 | Michael Brooks | $19.4M
Facility
$19.4M
MN AVG
$9.9M
Rank
#25 / 89 | $9.6M
Facility
$9.6M
MN AVG
$4.9M
Rank
#25 / 89 | 49.5%
Facility
49.5%
MN AVG
50.7%
Rank
#70 / 89 | 245271 |
Providence Place is located in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Minnesota.
Providence Place is in the Standish neighborhood of Minneapolis.
Providence Place has a walk score of 72. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Providence Place's occupancy is 78.6%.
Yes — there are 5 photos of Providence Place in the photo gallery on this page.
Providence Place is located at 3720 23rd Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55407, United States.
(612) 724-5495 will put you in contact with the team at Providence Place.
Yes — Providence Place is a CMS-certified provider of Medicare and Medicaid.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
