5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility is a 52-bed nursing home in Greenville, South Carolina, offering skilled nursing, assisted living, memory care, and rehabilitation services. Operated by the nonprofit Rolling Green Village on a 175-acre campus, the community has been continuously operating for 49 years. The facility accepts Medicare and private pay. CMS rates the facility 4 stars overall, 36.5% above the South Carolina average, driven by an exceptional staffing score. Nurse staffing averages 7 hours and 30 minutes per resident per day, ranking second among 112 South Carolina skilled nursing facilities and nearly double the state average of 4 hours and 5 minutes. That level of direct-care coverage is a meaningful differentiator for residents with complex post-acute needs. The inspection record is mixed. Three inspections since 2022 have produced 5 citations, well below the South Carolina average of 13.7, ranking 11th in the state in citation count. At 1.67 citations per inspection, compared with a state mean of 3.44, the per-visit rate is similarly clean. The facility has carried no fines and no payment denials in the past three years. Two of the five citations involved critical quality-of-care findings from February 2023, both of which were later corrected. A moderate abuse/neglect citation from April 2024 is also corrected. The below-average Health Inspection sub-rating reflects those complaint-driven findings rather than standard inspection performance. The facility provides rehabilitation services and a dedicated Alzheimer’s unit anchoring the care model, supported by on-site speech, physical, and occupational therapy staff. Dining includes multiple venues with a private dining room. With a 19-day average length of stay and a payer mix oriented toward Medicare and private pay, the facility suits short-term post-acute rehabilitation as well as residents seeking memory care within a nonprofit, campus-style continuum in Greenville County.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 2nd out of 118 homes in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 1h 49m per day | ▲ 188% State avg: 38m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 1h 44m per day | ▲ 72% State avg: 1h 0m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 18m per day | ▲ 4% State avg: 2h 13m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 4h 41m per day | ▲ 40% State avg: 3h 22m per day · National avg: 3h 27m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 17m per day | ▲ 244% State avg: 5m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 1h 8m per day | ▲ 167% State avg: 25m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility is legally operated by Rolling Green Village, and administered by Anna Grace Lord.
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
In South Carolina, the Department of Public Health, Bureau of Healthcare Quality conducts unannounced inspections to ensure care providers meet all health and safety codes.
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the South Carolina state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | SC Average | vs. SC Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 3 | 12 | This facility has 75% fewer total deficiencies than a typical South Carolina nursing home (3 vs. SC avg 12).↓ 75% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 0.8 | 3 | This facility has 73% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical South Carolina nursing home (0.8 vs. SC avg 3).↓ 73% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | SC Average | vs. SC Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 4 | 4 | This facility has total inspections in line with the South Carolina average (4 vs. SC avg 4).— At avg |
South Carolina average 3.9
Last Health inspection on Apr 2024
South Carolina average 13.7
South Carolina average 3.44
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
2 of 5 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 3 of 5 resulted from complaint investigations.
100% worse than South Carolina averageSouth Carolina average: 1
100% better than South Carolina averageSouth Carolina average: 0.3
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
148% more staff per resident than South Carolina average
9% worse than South Carolina average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 9 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
9
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.2 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 16 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
16
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.9 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 26 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
26
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.7 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
2,807 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 26 | 0 | 26 | 3,864 | 92 | 100% | 8.7 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 16 | 0 | 16 | 2,430 | 92 | 100% | 8.9 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 5 | 0 | 5 | 2,042 | 87 | 95% | 7.9 |
| Registered Nurse | 9 | 0 | 9 | 1,369 | 87 | 95% | 8.2 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,248 | 62 | 67% | 8 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 3 | 3 | 824 | 65 | 71% | 4.4 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 5 | 5 | 473 | 73 | 79% | 3.6 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 1 | 0 | 1 | 472 | 59 | 64% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 3 | 3 | 466 | 75 | 82% | 4.6 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 432 | 54 | 59% | 8 |
| Administrator | 0 | 1 | 1 | 424 | 53 | 58% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 2 | 2 | 343 | 52 | 57% | 6.5 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 4 | 4 | 198 | 64 | 70% | 3 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 52 | 13 | 14% | 4 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 11% | 1.8 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 3% | 3 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
54% lower than South Carolina averageSouth Carolina average: $34K
18% fewer fines than South Carolina averageSouth Carolina average: 2.4
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than South Carolina averageSouth Carolina average: 0.1
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
41.6%
48% worse than South Carolina averageSouth Carolina average: 79.5%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than South Carolina averageSouth Carolina average: 1.7%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.0%
In line with South Carolina averageSouth Carolina average: 78.0%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
47% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
53% of new residents, often for short stays.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
18Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Family members meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of family members that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, resident care, and activities.
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #9 / 121Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 9th out of 121 homes in South Carolina for payroll. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the South Carolina average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in South Carolina that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #62 / 121Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 62nd out of 121 homes in South Carolina for payroll %. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the South Carolina average. Well-run South Carolina facilities typically land around 52–64% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in South Carolina that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Pets Allowed
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (53% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 3 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
1 Hoke Smith Blvd, Greenville, SC 29615-5308
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SC Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
| Linville Court at The Cascades Verdae | NH AL IL MC SNF | Greenville (Cascades Verdae) | 44
Facility
44
SC AVG
90
Rank
#271 / 307 |
92.3%
Facility
92.3%
SC AVG
84.8
Rank
#41 / 94 | +9% | 6.16
Facility
6.16
SC AVG
4.00
Rank
#5 / 118 | +3% | +54% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$34.8k
Rank
#1 / 120 | 6
Facility
6
SC AVG
13.7
Rank
#20 / 119 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#14 / 119 | 1 | 41 | - |
8
Facility
8
SC AVG
32
Rank
#196 / 230 | Banyan Greenville LLC | $7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
$13.0M
Rank
#8 / 121 | $7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#37 / 121 | 94.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
94.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
44%
Rank
#119 / 121 | 425392 | ||||
| Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility | NH AL IL MC SNF | Greenville | 52
Facility
52
SC AVG
90
Rank
#241 / 307 | - | - | 7.49
Facility
7.49
SC AVG
4.00
Rank
#2 / 118 | +18% | +87% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$34.8k
Rank
#1 / 120 | 5
Facility
5
SC AVG
13.7
Rank
#14 / 119 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#11 / 119 | 2 | 18 | A+ | - | Rolling Green Village | $24.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$24.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
$13.0M
Rank
#14 / 121 | $10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#9 / 121 | 44.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
44.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
44%
Rank
#62 / 121 | 425160 | ||||
| Nhc Healthcare Mauldin | NH HC HOS SNF | Greenville | 180
Facility
180
SC AVG
90
Rank
#7 / 307 |
94.0%
Facility
94.0%
SC AVG
84.8
Rank
#29 / 94 | +11% | 4.08
Facility
4.08
SC AVG
4.00
Rank
#41 / 118 | -6% | +2% | $6.9k
Facility
$6.9k
SC AVG
$34.8k
Rank
#62 / 120 | 8
Facility
8
SC AVG
13.7
Rank
#35 / 119 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#83 / 119 | - | 169 | - | - | Gideon Sellars | $20.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$20.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
$13.0M
Rank
#16 / 121 | $12.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#8 / 121 | 61.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
61.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
44%
Rank
#42 / 121 | 425359 | ||||
| West Village Post Acute | NH HOS SNF | Greenville | 132
Facility
132
SC AVG
90
Rank
#37 / 307 |
95.4%
Facility
95.4%
SC AVG
84.8
Rank
#22 / 94 | +12% | 3.36
Facility
3.36
SC AVG
4.00
Rank
#88 / 118 | +128% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$34.8k
Rank
#1 / 120 | 23
Facility
23
SC AVG
13.7
Rank
#105 / 119 | 4.6
Facility
4.6
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#95 / 119 | 1 | 126 | - | - | Jeffrey Waters | $11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
$13.0M
Rank
#54 / 121 | $6.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#53 / 121 | 55.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
55.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
SC AVG
44%
Rank
#74 / 121 | 425102 | ||||
| Magnolia Manor of Greenville | NH HOS RC SNF | Greenville (Green Avenue) | 99
Facility
99
SC AVG
90
Rank
#118 / 307 |
93.8%
Facility
93.8%
SC AVG
84.8
Rank
#34 / 94 | +11% | 3.35
Facility
3.35
SC AVG
4.00
Rank
#88 / 118 | -24% | -16% | $4.3k
Facility
$4.3k
SC AVG
$34.8k
Rank
#56 / 120 | 11
Facility
11
SC AVG
13.7
Rank
#57 / 119 | 2.8
Facility
2.8
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#47 / 119 | - | 93 | - |
66
Facility
66
SC AVG
32
Rank
#8 / 230 | Tonya Bryant | $8.1MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
$8.1MFiscal year ending 09/2023
SC AVG
$13.0M
Rank
#93 / 121 | $4.7MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
$4.7MFiscal year ending 09/2023
SC AVG
$5.4M
Rank
#92 / 121 | 58.7%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
58.7%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
SC AVG
44%
Rank
#55 / 121 | 425090 |
Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility is located in GREENVILLE, South Carolina.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in South Carolina.
Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility is legally operated by Rolling Green Village, and administered by Anna Grace Lord.
According to SC state health department records, Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility's license number is CRC-0573.
Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility's occupancy is 84.9%.
Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility has been operating for approximately 49 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Yes, Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility allows residents to bring their pets.
The team at Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility can be reached at ANNAGRACED@ROLLINGGREENVILLAGE.COM.
Rolling Green Village Assisted Living Facility is registered as a for-profit in SC.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
