Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
62
41 employees · 21 contractors · 21 on an average day Simpson Place
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Dallas, TX
ALM Inspection Grade
C
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Simpson Place
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Dallas, TX
ALM Inspection Grade
C
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 74 / 100, a C — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Simpson Place accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Overview of Simpson Place
Simpson Place in Dallas, Texas, delivers long-term and temporary care through assisted living, nursing home services, skilled nursing, and respite care. Assisted living assists with daily routines like dressing, bathing, and managing medications. Specialized short-term rehabilitation supports individuals recovering after a hospital stay, while respite programs accommodate temporary visits for individuals whose primary caregivers need time away.
This 120-bed community is managed by operator Pf Sp Alf Ops Ii. Daily nursing coverage averages 3 hours and 13 minutes per resident. Set in an area with an 81 walk score, the location enables residents to accomplish most daily tasks on foot without relying on vehicular transportation. Accepted payment methods include Medicare for qualifying short-term care, Medicaid, and private funds.
Prospective families seeking care options in Dallas can contact Simpson Place to verify room availability, ask about admissions requirements, or plan a tour of the grounds.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 13m
This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 13mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +7% above Texas average
5 of 6 metrics below Texas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 3 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
3 staff · 9.8-hour shifts
27m
↓ 2% · TX 27mThis facility: 27m per resident per day, 2% below the Texas average of 27m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 3 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
3 staff · 9.8-hour shiftsUS average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 10-hour shifts
1h 1m
↑ 7% · TX 57mThis facility: 1h 1m per resident per day, 7% above the Texas average of 57m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 10-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 17 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
17 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
1h 45m
↓ 16% · TX 2h 5mThis facility: 1h 45m per resident per day, 16% below the Texas average of 2h 5m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 17 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
17 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
0m
↓ 100% · TX 4mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 100% below the Texas average of 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 48m
↓ 8% · TX 3h 4mThis facility: 2h 48m per resident per day, 8% below the Texas average of 3h 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
12m
↓ 41% · TX 21mThis facility: 12m per resident per day, 41% below the Texas average of 21m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
62
41 employees · 21 contractors · 21 on an average day
62 total staff / 43 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.44 : 1
≈ 0% · TX 1.44This facility: 1.44 staff per resident, level with the Texas average of 1.44 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
62 staff ÷ 43 residents
See full Texas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.4 h
↑ 4% · TX 8.1 hThis facility: 8.4 h, 4% above the Texas average of 8.1 h (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
16,217 staff hours this quarter
See full Texas ranking →91.6% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Texas average: 94.4% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Assistant (5), Physical Therapy Aide (5), Qualified Social Worker (4), Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Speech Language Pathologist (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
170
Rank #98 / 257Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 98th out of 257 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
170
Rank #98 / 257Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 98th out of 257 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
50 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 120 state-licensed beds.
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #9 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #9 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
81
/ 100
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
44
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
110
days
About This Community
Facility TypeType B
CountyDallas
CMS Certification Number676453
QualificationNursing
Inspection Rating4 stars Overall by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services
Simpson Place is legally operated by Pf Sp Alf Ops Ii, LLC.
OwnerHopkins County Hospital District
Owner NamePf Sp Alf Ops Ii LLC
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Outpatient Therapy
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Nursing Assessment
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
TransportationListed as: Coordinated transportation
Laundry & Linen
Pets not allowed
Fitness Center
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Simpson Place.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Simpson Place.Food DescriptionSimpson Place offers a variety of delectable, nutritious dining choices prepared daily by chefs using fresh ingredients. Meals include three well-balanced options each day.
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Texas, the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is the primary regulatory body that conducts unannounced inspections and publishes quality reports for all long-term care homes.
ALM Inspection Grade
74 / 100
Combined grade: CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds and
Texas inspection data for its
state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count
How the two records combine
Nursing-home beds (CMS) · 29% of the grade
B+ · 88/100
6 points above the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100).
50 certified beds, 29% of the grade. Graded with CMS-certified facilities on the national scale.
Citations
Typical
83 severity-weighted points (32 citations) · 2% lower than the typical CMS-certified TX facility (median: 85)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
13 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified TX facility (median: 16)
Texas state-licensed beds · 71% of the grade
D+ · 68/100
15 points below the Texas average for state-licensed facilities (83/100).
120 licensed beds, 71% of the grade. Graded with Texas state-licensed facilities on the Texas scale.
Health citations
Concern
13 health citations · 13× more than the typical state-licensed TX facility (median: 1)
Life safety citations
Typical
5 life safety citations · 25% more than the typical state-licensed TX facility (median: 4)
How the final grade is calculated
C · 74/100
88 × 29% + 68 × 71% = 74 / 100
The two grades are combined in proportion to the beds each record covers: 50 CMS-certified nursing-home beds (29%) and 120 Texas state-licensed beds (71%). The result, 74 out of 100, is a C on the same scale every ALM Inspection Grade uses.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Texas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. TX average
3 Worse
Metrics worse than Texas average:
• Total citations (157% above)
• Health citations (225% above)
• Inspections with citations (100% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Texas average:
• Life safety citations (17% below)
• Total citations (157% above)
• Health citations (225% above)
• Inspections with citations (100% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Texas average:
• Life safety citations (17% below)
Citations
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 18 | 7.0 | This facility has 157% more total citations than a typical Texas nursing home (18 vs. TX avg 7).↑ 157% worse |
|
Health citations
Citations related to resident care, clinical practices, and day-to-day operations.
| 13 | 4.0 | This facility has 225% more health citations than a typical Texas nursing home (13 vs. TX avg 4).↑ 225% worse |
|
Life safety citations
Citations related to building safety — fire prevention, emergency egress, and similar.
| 5 | 6.0 | This facility has 17% fewer life safety citations than a typical Texas nursing home (5 vs. TX avg 6).↓ 17% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | TX Average | vs. TX Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 2 | 1.0 | This facility has 100% more inspections with citations than a typical Texas nursing home (2 vs. TX avg 1).↑ 100% worse |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
10
↑ 27% · TX 7.9This facility: 10, 27% above the Texas average of 7.9 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
32
Rank #170 / 234Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 170th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Texas State average, with a ranking across all 234 TX facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 16% · TX 27.7This facility: 32, 16% above the Texas average of 27.7 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.2
Rank #109 / 234Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Texas mean across 234 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 12% · TX 3.65This facility: 3.2, 12% below the Texas average of 3.65 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
32 of 32 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · TX 1.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 1.9 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
32
↑ 29% · TX 24.9This facility: 32, 29% above the Texas average of 24.9 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 30, 2026 · 8 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 9 of 32 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 30, 2026
8 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 03, 2026
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 15, 2026
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 05, 2025
4 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 13, 2025
6 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 22, 2024
4 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 15, 2024
2 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 18, 2024
1 citation
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 20, 2023
2 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 04, 2023
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 32 citations
Quality of Life & Care
9 deficiencies (28%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
7 deficiencies (22%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (9%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (9%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (9%)
Environmental
3 deficiencies (9%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (6%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (3%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
10 of 32 citations resulted from standard inspections; 16 of 32 resulted from complaint investigations; and 6 of 32 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
TX avg $66KTexas average: $65,686. Average among the 815 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
TX avg 2.16Texas average: 2.16. Average among the 815 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
TX avg 0.18Texas average: 0.18. Average among the 815 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Texas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 23% · TX 4.1This facility: 5.0, 23% above the TX average of 4.1 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 30% · TX 3.1This facility: 4.0, 30% above the TX average of 3.1 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
2.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 65% · TX 7.9This facility: 2.8, 65% below the TX average of 7.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 72% · TX 14.5This facility: 4.1, 72% below the TX average of 14.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 9 better, 2 near TX average
3 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 near TX average
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.8%
↓ 50% · TX 15.8This facility: 7.8, 50% below the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.8%
↓ 50% · TX 15.8This facility: 7.8, 50% below the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.1%
↓ 85% · TX 14.0This facility: 2.1, 85% below the TX average of 14.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.1%
↓ 85% · TX 14.0This facility: 2.1, 85% below the TX average of 14.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
2.4%
↓ 82% · TX 13.4This facility: 2.4, 82% below the TX average of 13.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
2.4%
↓ 82% · TX 13.4This facility: 2.4, 82% below the TX average of 13.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8%
↓ 76% · TX 3.3This facility: 0.8, 76% below the TX average of 3.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8%
↓ 76% · TX 3.3This facility: 0.8, 76% below the TX average of 3.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
↓ 40% · TX 3.8This facility: 2.3, 40% below the TX average of 3.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
↓ 40% · TX 3.8This facility: 2.3, 40% below the TX average of 3.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.9%
↓ 69% · TX 3.0This facility: 0.9, 69% below the TX average of 3.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.9%
↓ 69% · TX 3.0This facility: 0.9, 69% below the TX average of 3.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.8%
↓ 26% · TX 2.4This facility: 1.8, 26% below the TX average of 2.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.8%
↓ 26% · TX 2.4This facility: 1.8, 26% below the TX average of 2.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.8%
↓ 60% · TX 9.6This facility: 3.8, 60% below the TX average of 9.6 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.8%
↓ 60% · TX 9.6This facility: 3.8, 60% below the TX average of 9.6 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · TX 96.5This facility: 100.0, 4% above the TX average of 96.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · TX 96.5This facility: 100.0, 4% above the TX average of 96.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · TX 98.0This facility: 100.0, 2% above the TX average of 98.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · TX 98.0This facility: 100.0, 2% above the TX average of 98.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
↓ 33% · TX 1.5This facility: 1.0, 33% below the TX average of 1.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
↓ 33% · TX 1.5This facility: 1.0, 33% below the TX average of 1.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 12% · TX 88.9This facility: 99.4, 12% above the TX average of 88.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 12% · TX 88.9This facility: 99.4, 12% above the TX average of 88.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.7%
↑ 3% · TX 88.0This facility: 90.7, 3% above the TX average of 88.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.7%
↑ 3% · TX 88.0This facility: 90.7, 3% above the TX average of 88.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Simpson Place’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending 2022. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY 2022
Latest cost report is for the fiscal year ending 2022, older than most Texas homes. Rankings are not shown because peers report different years.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−4.6% operating margin
−3.3 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 4 of the last 4 reported years. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Texas homes
51.5% payroll share of revenue
TX average 68.8%
Payroll rose $0.3M while revenue rose $0.2M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2022 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2022 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Texas homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2022 | vs prior year | Trend 2019 → 2022Trend | TX median | Compared with TX homesRank in TX | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $3.9M | +$0.2M | Trend 20192022 | TX median $9.3M | Rank in TX Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $4.0M | +$0.4M | Trend 20192022 | TX median — | Rank in TX Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | Trend 20192022 | TX median — | Rank in TX Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −4.6% | −3.3 pts | Trend 20192022 | TX median — | Rank in TX Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.4M | −$0.1M | Trend — | TX median — | Rank in TX Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Texas homes
| Metric | FY 2022 | vs prior year | Trend 2019 → 2022Trend | TX median | Compared with TX homesRank in TX | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $2.0M | +$0.3M | Trend 20192022 | TX median $4.9M | Rank in TX Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 51.5% | +4.4 pts | Trend 20192022 | TX median 57.6% | Rank in TX Not ranked | 17.3 pts under TX average The TX average is 68.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2019–2022 2 charts · TX benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Texas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin TX payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2019–2022 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $5.1M | $5.6M | $3.6M | $3.9M |
| Operating expenses | $7.5M | $7.7M | $3.7M | $4.0M |
| Net patient income | −$2.4M | −$2.1M | −$0.0M | −$0.2M |
| Operating margin | −45.8% | −38.0% | −1.3% | −4.6% |
| Net income | −$2.3M | −$0.6M | $0.4M | $0.4M |
| Payroll costs | $3.1M | $3.2M | $1.7M | $2.0M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 60.5% | 57.3% | 47.1% | 51.5% |
| Beds | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Gross revenue | $6.0M | $6.2M | $4.4M | $4.9M |
| Salaries | $2.8M | $2.9M | $1.6M | $1.8M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.2M | $0.2M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $4.4M | $4.5M | $2.0M | $2.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $379 | $386 | $243 | $239 |
| Cost per day | $552 | $533 | $246 | $250 |
| Average length of stay | 85.8 days | 143.3 days | 76.5 days | 75.1 days |
Showing 2022–2020 · scroll sideways for 1 earlier year
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
85 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
16 · 19%
Medicaid
46 · 54%
Private pay & other
23 · 27%
Resident snapshot
43 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
6 · 14%
Medicaid
26 · 60%
Private pay & other
11 · 26%
Leaving
94 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
28 · 30%
Medicaid
61 · 65%
Private pay & other
5 · 5%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Simpson Place
1.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Dallas's city center to Simpson Place's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Simpson Place
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Dallas
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the TX Health & Human Services Commission (HHSC), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Texas average is: 68.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presbyterian Village North | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | Dallas (Lake Highlands) | 88
Facility
88
TX AVG
109
Rank
#179 / 257 | A |
80.1%
Facility
80.1%
TX AVG
71.5%
Rank
#54 / 175 | +12% | 4.80
Facility
4.80
TX AVG
3.50
Rank
#28 / 233 | +20% | +37% | $36.5k
Facility
$36.5k
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#151 / 236 | 12
Facility
12
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#23 / 234 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#21 / 234 | 2 | 71 | - |
61
Facility
61
TX AVG
44
Rank
#57 / 276 | Presbyterian Village North | $15.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$10.2M
Rank
#25 / 225 | $22.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$22.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
$5.8M
Rank
#5 / 225 | 140.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
140.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
TX AVG
68.8%
Rank
#8 / 202 | 676135 | ||||
| The Legacy Midtown Park | NH AL HOS IL MC SNF | Dallas (Vickery Meadow) | 152
Facility
152
TX AVG
109
Rank
#167 / 257 | ? | - | - | 6.27
Facility
6.27
TX AVG
3.50
Rank
#5 / 233 | +1% | +79% | $27.5k
Facility
$27.5k
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#134 / 236 | 7
Facility
7
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#7 / 234 | 1.2
Facility
1.2
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#1 / 234 | - | 49 | - |
45
Facility
45
TX AVG
44
Rank
#139 / 276 | The Legacy Midtown Park, Inc | $18.6MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$18.6MFiscal year ending 09/2024
TX AVG
$10.2M
Rank
#13 / 225 | $16.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$16.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
TX AVG
$5.8M
Rank
#8 / 225 | 87%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
87%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
TX AVG
68.8%
Rank
#23 / 202 | 676489 | ||||
| C C Young Memorial Home | NH AL HC HOS IL MC PC SNF | Dallas | 184
Facility
184
TX AVG
109
Rank
#224 / 257 | A | - | - | 5.49
Facility
5.49
TX AVG
3.50
Rank
#10 / 233 | +8% | +57% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#1 / 236 | 8
Facility
8
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#12 / 234 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#21 / 234 | - | 114 | - |
20
Facility
20
TX AVG
44
Rank
#235 / 276 | C. C. Young Memorial Home | $33.1MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$33.1MFiscal year ending 03/2025
TX AVG
$10.2M
Rank
#5 / 225 | $31.1MFiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
$31.1MFiscal year ending 03/2025
TX AVG
$5.8M
Rank
#1 / 225 | 93.9%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
Facility
93.9%Fiscal year ending 03/2025
TX AVG
68.8%
Rank
#20 / 202 | 675592 | ||||
| Christian Care Communities and Services – Mesquite | NH AL CCRC IL MC RC SNF | Mesquite | 180
Facility
180
TX AVG
109
Rank
#12 / 257 | ? |
45.1%
Facility
45.1%
TX AVG
71.5%
Rank
#167 / 175 | -37% | 4.37
Facility
4.37
TX AVG
3.50
Rank
#42 / 233 | +32% | +25% | $28.9k
Facility
$28.9k
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#136 / 236 | 15
Facility
15
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#39 / 234 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#8 / 234 | 4 | 81 | - |
31
Facility
31
TX AVG
44
Rank
#203 / 276 | Fannin County Hospital Authority | $5.4M*Fiscal year ending 11/2021These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $11.2M*Fiscal year ending 11/2021These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 206.1%*Fiscal year ending 11/2021These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 455617 | ||||
| Simpson Place | NH AL RC SNF | Dallas (Old East Dallas) | 170
Facility
170
TX AVG
109
Rank
#98 / 257 | C | - | - | 3.21
Facility
3.21
TX AVG
3.50
Rank
#120 / 233 | -37% | -8% | $0
Facility
$0
TX AVG
$66.1k
Rank
#1 / 236 | 32
Facility
32
TX AVG
27.7
Rank
#170 / 234 | 3.2
Facility
3.2
TX AVG
3.6
Rank
#109 / 234 | - | 44 | - |
81
Facility
81
TX AVG
44
Rank
#9 / 276 | Pf Sp Alf Ops II LLC | $3.9M*Fiscal year ending 09/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $2.0M*Fiscal year ending 09/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 51.5%*Fiscal year ending 09/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 676453 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other TX nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Texas
Simpson Place is located in DALLAS, Texas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Texas.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Simpson Place
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Simpson Place in?
Simpson Place is in the Old East Dallas neighborhood of DALLAS.
02 Who is the owner of Simpson Place?
Simpson Place is legally operated by Pf Sp Alf Ops Ii, LLC.
03 Is Simpson Place in a walkable area?
Simpson Place has a walk score of 81. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Simpson Place?
Simpson Place's occupancy is 83.7%.
05 Are pets allowed at Simpson Place?
No, Simpson Place has a no-pet policy.
06 Does Simpson Place operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Simpson Place is registered as a for-profit in TX.
07 What is the overall rating for Simpson Place?
Simpson Place received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
