Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
86
57 employees · 29 contractors · 24 on an average day Tabitha at Prairie Commons
Nursing Home, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Grand Island, NE
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Tabitha at Prairie Commons
Nursing Home, Independent Living, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Grand Island, NE
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Tabitha at Prairie Commons accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of Tabitha at Prairie Commons
Tabitha at Prairie Commons in Grand Island, Nebraska, offers independent living, memory care, respite care, nursing home care, and skilled nursing. Independent living provides a private home without daily care, while memory care offers a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering. Respite care is a short stay when a resident’s usual caregiver needs time away, and nursing home and skilled nursing care provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Several care levels are available within one community. For a resident whose needs grow over time, that can avoid a move to a different community. The community has 36 beds, creating a smaller setting where staff and residents get to know each other. Tabitha Grand Island operates the community.
Total nurse staffing is 5 hours and 21 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands on nursing time attributed to each resident. Medicare and private pay are accepted: Medicare can cover short term skilled care after a hospital stay, while private pay means the family pays directly. Pets are allowed, so a resident can bring a pet when moving in.
Tabitha at Prairie Commons may be a good fit for a resident who wants private independent living, needs secured memory care, requires short term respite, or may eventually need nursing home or skilled nursing care without changing communities.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 21m
This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 113 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 21mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +184% above Nebraska average
0 of 6 metrics below Nebraska average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 8 total: 4 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
8 staff · 10.2-hour shifts
50m
↑ 17% · NE 43mThis facility: 50m per resident per day, 17% above the Nebraska average of 43m (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 8 total: 4 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
8 staff · 10.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 10 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
10 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
1h 3m
↑ 46% · NE 43mThis facility: 1h 3m per resident per day, 46% above the Nebraska average of 43m (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 10 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
10 staff · 9.2-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 31 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
31 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
3h 28m
↑ 25% · NE 2h 46mThis facility: 3h 28m per resident per day, 25% above the Nebraska average of 2h 46m (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 31 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
31 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
9m
↑ 184% · NE 3mThis facility: 9m per resident per day, 184% above the Nebraska average of 3m (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 52m
↑ 34% · NE 3h 37mThis facility: 4h 52m per resident per day, 34% above the Nebraska average of 3h 37m (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
29m
↑ 1% · NE 29mThis facility: 29m per resident per day, 1% above the Nebraska average of 29m (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
86
57 employees · 29 contractors · 24 on an average day
86 total staff / 30 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.87 : 1
↑ 43% · NE 2.01This facility: 2.87 staff per resident, 43% above the Nebraska average of 2.01 (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
86 staff ÷ 30 residents
See full Nebraska ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.5 h
↓ 4% · NE 7.8 hThis facility: 7.5 h, 4% below the Nebraska average of 7.8 h (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
16,311 staff hours this quarter
See full Nebraska ranking →71.4% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Nebraska average: 89.6% · Contractors this quarter: Licensed Practical Nurse (4), Physical Therapy Aide (4), Registered Nurse (4), Qualified Social Worker (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Medication Aide/Technician (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Clinical Nurse Specialist (2), Administrator (1), Nurse Practitioner (1), Medical Director (1), Speech Language Pathologist (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
36
Rank #117 / 127Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 117th out of 127 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Nebraska facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
36
Rank #117 / 127Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 117th out of 127 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Nebraska facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #129 / 136Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 129th out of 136 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Nebraska facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #129 / 136Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 129th out of 136 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Nebraska facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
14
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #43 / 121Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 121 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Nebraska average, with its Statewide rank out of 121. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #43 / 121Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 121 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Nebraska average, with its Statewide rank out of 121. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
82.5%
This home usually has availability
Based on 29.7 residents and 36 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Nebraska average: 73.8%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
82
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
StatusActive
CountyHall
License NumberALF428
Medicare-approved care — MedicareA specialty credential or certification held by the community or its staff, indicating training or standards beyond basic state licensure.
Tabitha at Prairie Commons is legally operated by Tabitha Grand Island, Inc.
Medicaid and Medicare
36 units
Total beds
36 units
Resident Council
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
Dietitian
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Customized Resident-Centered Care Plans
Social Work & Case ManagementListed as: Social services and counseling
Laundry & Linen
Transportation
Fax(308) 675-8107
Pets Allowed
Patio
Walking Paths
Beauty Salon
Activities
Games
Social Clubs
Musical Performances
Excursions
Cognitive and Social Stimulation Programs
1 Bedroom
324 sq ft
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Nebraska, the Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public Health conducts regular inspections to ensure nursing and assisted living facilities meet state and federal standards.
Since 2023 · 3 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 0 deficiencies 1 inspection
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 0 deficiencies 1 inspection
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Nebraska state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2023 vs. Nebraska state average
Overall vs. NE average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 Better
Metrics better than Nebraska average:
• Total deficiencies (100% below)
• Total deficiencies (100% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | NE Average | vs. NE Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 0 | 52.0 | This facility has 100% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Nebraska nursing home (0 vs. NE avg 52).↓ 100% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | NE Average | vs. NE Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 1 | 13.0 | This facility has had 92% fewer total inspections than the Nebraska average (1 vs. NE avg 13). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 92% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
4
↓ 13% · NE 4.6This facility: 4, 13% below the Nebraska average of 4.6 (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
16
Rank #60 / 121Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 60th out of 121 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Nebraska State average, with a ranking across all 121 NE facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 17% · NE 19.3This facility: 16, 17% below the Nebraska average of 19.3 (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
4
Rank #62 / 121Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 121 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Nebraska mean across 121 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 4% · NE 4.16This facility: 4, 4% below the Nebraska average of 4.16 (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
16 of 16 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 400% · NE 0.2This facility: 1, 400% above the Nebraska average of 0.2 (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 100% · NE 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the Nebraska average of 0.5 (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
14
↓ 23% · NE 18.3This facility: 14, 23% below the Nebraska average of 18.3 (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · NE 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Nebraska average of 0.3 (among Nebraska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 03, 2026 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, serious), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 6 of 16 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 03, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 01, 2025
5 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 23, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 01, 2024
8 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 16 citations
Quality of Life & Care
6 deficiencies (38%)
Resident Rights
3 deficiencies (19%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (19%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (13%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (6%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
12 of 16 citations resulted from standard inspections; 3 of 16 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 16 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Jun 3, 2026 · $14,380 civil money penalty
Jun 3, 2026 · $14,380 civil money penalty
May 1, 2025 · $10,296 civil money penalty
Total fines
$24,676
↓ 29% · NE $35KThis facility: $24,676, 29% below the Nebraska average of $34,803. Average among the 66 Nebraska facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #96 / 121Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 96th out of 121 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Nebraska average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 121 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↑ 71% · NE 1.17This facility: 2, 71% above the Nebraska average of 1.17. Average among the 66 Nebraska facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
NE avg 0.71Nebraska average: 0.71. Average among the 66 Nebraska facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jun 3, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,380
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,380
May 1, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$10,296
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$10,296Fine amount comparison
This facility
$24,676
Nebraska average
$34,803
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Nebraska and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Nebraska average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 29% · NE 9.8This facility: 12.6, 29% above the NE average of 9.8 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
34.2
Score · lower is better
↑ 68% · NE 20.3This facility: 34.2, 68% above the NE average of 20.3 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.9 long-stay measures: 2 better, 7 worse
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 9 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
35.3%
↑ 86% · NE 19.0This facility: 35.3, 86% above the NE average of 19.0 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
35.3%
↑ 86% · NE 19.0This facility: 35.3, 86% above the NE average of 19.0 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.1%
↑ 32% · NE 25.0This facility: 33.1, 32% above the NE average of 25.0 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.1%
↑ 32% · NE 25.0This facility: 33.1, 32% above the NE average of 25.0 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.1%
↑ 234% · NE 2.7This facility: 9.1, 234% above the NE average of 2.7 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.1%
↑ 234% · NE 2.7This facility: 9.1, 234% above the NE average of 2.7 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 67% · NE 4.5This facility: 1.5, 67% below the NE average of 4.5 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
↓ 67% · NE 4.5This facility: 1.5, 67% below the NE average of 4.5 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.9%
↑ 47% · NE 4.0This facility: 5.9, 47% above the NE average of 4.0 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.9%
↑ 47% · NE 4.0This facility: 5.9, 47% above the NE average of 4.0 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7%
↑ 50% · NE 5.1This facility: 7.7, 50% above the NE average of 5.1 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7%
↑ 50% · NE 5.1This facility: 7.7, 50% above the NE average of 5.1 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.2%
↑ 267% · NE 4.4This facility: 16.2, 267% above the NE average of 4.4 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.2%
↑ 267% · NE 4.4This facility: 16.2, 267% above the NE average of 4.4 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.3%
↓ 21% · NE 20.7This facility: 16.3, 21% below the NE average of 20.7 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.3%
↓ 21% · NE 20.7This facility: 16.3, 21% below the NE average of 20.7 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.8%
↓ 7% · NE 93.0This facility: 86.8, 7% below the NE average of 93.0 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.8%
↓ 7% · NE 93.0This facility: 86.8, 7% below the NE average of 93.0 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
58.6%
↑ 9% · US 53.7This facility: 58.6, 9% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
58.6%
↑ 9% · US 53.7This facility: 58.6, 9% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
62.2%
↑ 23% · US 50.6This facility: 62.2, 23% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
62.2%
↑ 23% · US 50.6This facility: 62.2, 23% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.1%
↑ 44% · US 0.8This facility: 1.1, 44% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.1%
↑ 44% · US 0.8This facility: 1.1, 44% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.2%
↑ 193% · NE 2.1This facility: 6.2, 193% above the NE average of 2.1 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.2%
↑ 193% · NE 2.1This facility: 6.2, 193% above the NE average of 2.1 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.3%
↑ 16% · NE 81.3This facility: 94.3, 16% above the NE average of 81.3 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.3%
↑ 16% · NE 81.3This facility: 94.3, 16% above the NE average of 81.3 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
44.8%
↓ 39% · NE 73.9This facility: 44.8, 39% below the NE average of 73.9 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
44.8%
↓ 39% · NE 73.9This facility: 44.8, 39% below the NE average of 73.9 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
11.7%
↓ 44% · NE 20.9This facility: 11.7, 44% below the NE average of 20.9 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
11.7%
↓ 44% · NE 20.9This facility: 11.7, 44% below the NE average of 20.9 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
5.4%
↓ 53% · NE 11.6This facility: 5.4, 53% below the NE average of 11.6 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
5.4%
↓ 53% · NE 11.6This facility: 5.4, 53% below the NE average of 11.6 (among NE facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Tabitha at Prairie Commons’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 117 Nebraska nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−86.5% operating margin
— vs prior year
An operating loss in 1 of the last 1 reported years. Other income ($0.5M) trims the net loss to −$5.0M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Nebraska homes
62.1% payroll share of revenue
NE average 61.2%Rank #58 / 117Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 117 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Nebraska average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Nebraska homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2024 → 2024Trend | NE median | Compared with NE homesRank in NE | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.4M | — | Trend — | NE median $6.3M | Rank in NE Rank #58 / 117Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 117 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Nebraska average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 51% of homes | Above NE median Higher net patient revenue than 51% of NE homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $11.9M | — | Trend — | NE median $6.7M | Rank in NE Rank #20 / 117Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 117 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Nebraska homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 84% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$5.5M | — | Trend — | NE median −$0.1M | Rank in NE Rank #116 / 117Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 116th out of 117 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Nebraska homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 1% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −86.5% | — | Trend — | NE median −2.5% | Rank in NE Rank #117 / 117Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 117th out of 117 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Nebraska homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.5M | — | Trend — | NE median $0.1M | Rank in NE Rank #16 / 114Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 114 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Nebraska homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 87% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$5.0M | — | Trend — | NE median −$0.0M | Rank in NE Rank #116 / 117Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 116th out of 117 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Nebraska homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 1% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Nebraska homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2024 → 2024Trend | NE median | Compared with NE homesRank in NE | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.0M | — | Trend — | NE median $3.7M | Rank in NE Rank #53 / 117Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 117 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Nebraska average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Above NE median Higher payroll than 55% of NE homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 62.1% | — | Trend — | NE median 61.9% | Rank in NE Rank #58 / 117Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 117 nursing homes we track in Nebraska for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Nebraska average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Nebraska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 51% of homes | Near NE average The NE average is 61.2% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2024 2 charts · NE benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Nebraska payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin NE payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2024 |
|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.4M |
| Operating expenses | $11.9M |
| Net patient income | −$5.5M |
| Operating margin | −86.5% |
| Net income | −$5.0M |
| Payroll costs | $4.0M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 62.1% |
| Beds | 36 |
| Gross revenue | $6.9M |
| Salaries | $3.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.6M |
| Contract labor | $0.2M |
| Other operating costs | $8.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $981 |
| Cost per day | $1,831 |
| Average length of stay | 82.5 days |
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
118 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
81 · 69%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
37 · 31%
Resident snapshot
30 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
12 · 40%
Medicaid
4 · 13%
Private pay & other
14 · 47%
Leaving
79 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
59 · 75%
Medicaid
1 · 1%
Private pay & other
19 · 24%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Tabitha at Prairie Commons
Places of interest near Tabitha at Prairie Commons
3.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Grand Island's city center to Tabitha at Prairie Commons's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.22 miles to nearest hospital (Grand Island Regional Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Tabitha at Prairie Commons
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Grand Island
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NE Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Nebraska average is: 61.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiffany Square | NH SNF | Grand Island | 103
Facility
103
NE AVG
81
Rank
#31 / 127 |
88.0%
Facility
88.0%
NE AVG
73.8%
Rank
#26 / 121 | +19% | 4.06
Facility
4.06
NE AVG
4.56
Rank
#67 / 113 | -40% | -11% | $0
Facility
$0
NE AVG
$49.9k
Rank
#1 / 121 | 18
Facility
18
NE AVG
19.3
Rank
#69 / 121 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
NE AVG
4.2
Rank
#27 / 121 | - | 91 | - | - | Vhs Grand Island, LLC | $10.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
NE AVG
$8.0M
Rank
#21 / 117 | $6.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$6.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
NE AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#23 / 117 | 59.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
59.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
NE AVG
61.2%
Rank
#72 / 117 | 285087 | ||||
| Emerald Nursing & Rehab Lakeview | NH AL MC SNF | Grand Island | 95
Facility
95
NE AVG
81
Rank
#37 / 127 |
79.3%
Facility
79.3%
NE AVG
73.8%
Rank
#51 / 121 | +8% | 3.52
Facility
3.52
NE AVG
4.56
Rank
#97 / 113 | -42% | -23% | $13.4k
Facility
$13.4k
NE AVG
$49.9k
Rank
#98 / 121 | 22
Facility
22
NE AVG
19.3
Rank
#80 / 121 | 7.3
Facility
7.3
NE AVG
4.2
Rank
#116 / 121 | 1 | 75 | - | - | Grand Island Lakeview Operations LLC | $8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NE AVG
$8.0M
Rank
#35 / 117 | $4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NE AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#47 / 117 | 52%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
52%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NE AVG
61.2%
Rank
#96 / 117 | 285106 | ||||
| Good Samaritan Society – Grand Island Village | NH AL IL RC SNF | Grand Island | 67
Facility
67
NE AVG
81
Rank
#60 / 127 |
83.4%
Facility
83.4%
NE AVG
73.8%
Rank
#38 / 121 | +13% | 4.68
Facility
4.68
NE AVG
4.56
Rank
#30 / 113 | -14% | +3% | $10.0k
Facility
$10.0k
NE AVG
$49.9k
Rank
#95 / 121 | 23
Facility
23
NE AVG
19.3
Rank
#85 / 121 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
NE AVG
4.2
Rank
#43 / 121 | 1 | 56 | - |
2
Facility
2
NE AVG
48
Rank
#135 / 136 | Steven Husen | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NE AVG
$8.0M
Rank
#43 / 117 | $4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NE AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#40 / 117 | 61.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
61.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NE AVG
61.2%
Rank
#62 / 117 | 285285 | ||||
| Tabitha at Prairie Commons | NH IL MC RC SNF | Grand Island | 36
Facility
36
NE AVG
81
Rank
#117 / 127 |
82.5%
Facility
82.5%
NE AVG
73.8%
Rank
#43 / 121 | +12% | 5.35
Facility
5.35
NE AVG
4.56
Rank
#16 / 113 | -3% | +17% | $24.7k
Facility
$24.7k
NE AVG
$49.9k
Rank
#96 / 121 | 16
Facility
16
NE AVG
19.3
Rank
#60 / 121 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
NE AVG
4.2
Rank
#62 / 121 | 2 | 30 | - |
14
Facility
14
NE AVG
48
Rank
#129 / 136 | Tabitha Grand Island, Inc | $6.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NE AVG
$8.0M
Rank
#58 / 117 | $4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NE AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#53 / 117 | 62.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
62.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NE AVG
61.2%
Rank
#58 / 117 | 285307 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NE nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Nebraska
Tabitha at Prairie Commons is located in Grand Island, Nebraska.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Nebraska.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Tabitha at Prairie Commons
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Tabitha at Prairie Commons?
Tabitha at Prairie Commons is legally operated by Tabitha Grand Island, Inc.
02 Is Tabitha at Prairie Commons in a walkable area?
Tabitha at Prairie Commons has a walk score of 14. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
03 What is the license number of Tabitha at Prairie Commons?
According to NE state health department records, Tabitha at Prairie Commons's license number is ALF428.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Tabitha at Prairie Commons?
Tabitha at Prairie Commons's occupancy is 82.5%.
05 Are pets allowed at Tabitha at Prairie Commons?
Yes, Tabitha at Prairie Commons allows residents to bring their pets.
06 What is the best email address for Tabitha at Prairie Commons?
The team at Tabitha at Prairie Commons can be reached at info@eventide.org.
07 Does Tabitha at Prairie Commons operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Tabitha at Prairie Commons is registered as a non-profit in NE.
Updated on
