Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing
Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing is a privately owned skilled nursing community in Salt Lake City, Utah, providing skilled nursing care, rehabilitation services, and respite care. With a 36-bed capacity, the community currently serves 34 residents. Notably, its current residents are all under Medicaid coverage, reflecting its role as an accessible, long-term care option for individuals who depend on public funding for their nursing home stay.
The community holds a CMS 2-star overall rating, driven primarily by its staffing and health inspection scores. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day come in at 2 hours 8 minutes, the lowest among Utah skilled nursing communities benchmarked in this dataset. However, the quality measures rating stands above the Utah average, and long-stay resident outcomes have positive results. The high-risk clinical events composite score is 60% better than the Utah average, and the functional decline score is 46% better than the state mean. Specific long-stay outcomes that stand out include zero falls with major injury, zero urinary tract infections, a 75% improvement over state peers on daily activity independence, and a 76% improvement on walking ability preservation. These results suggest that older adults who remain in the community over time tend to maintain function and safety at notably higher rates than the statewide average.
On the inspection and compliance front, the community recorded 34 total health citations across four inspections over the past five years, averaging 8.5 per inspection against a Utah average of 7.6. The most common deficiency categories were Quality of Life and Care, Resident Rights, and Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. Two civil money penalties were assessed in September and October 2023, which is 78% below the Utah average penalty, and no payment denials have been recorded. The most recent inspection in June 2025 also resulted in four corrected citations in the areas of abuse or neglect protocols, administration, and infection control. However, zero critical citations appear in the five-year record, and three serious citations are slightly above the state average. Additionally, an active Resident Council meets regularly, providing older adults a formal channel for feedback on policies and quality of life.
The amenity offering is focused and practical, including semi-private suites, WiFi, and cable TV in each room, an on-site nutritionist, dining rooms, outdoor spaces, community lounges, and laundry and housekeeping services. A contracted dietitian and mental health service worker also provide supplemental support, and two nurse practitioners are part of the care team. The central Salt Lake City location also gives residents and families easy access to hospitals, pharmacies, and urban conveniences.
Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing is best suited for long-term Medicaid residents seeking a smaller, urban nursing home in Salt Lake City where physical safety outcomes and functional independence for older adults are priorities.
Capacity and availability
About this community
Occupancy
Inspection History
In Utah, the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Facility Licensing conducts regular onsite inspections to ensure compliance with state and federal healthcare standards.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Utah state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
• Deficiencies High (at UT avg)
• Deficiencies Low (at UT avg)
• Inspections with deficiencies (at UT avg)
• Inspection deficiency rate (at UT avg) 3 Better Metrics better than Utah average:
• Deficiencies (33% below)
• Deficiencies Moderate (100% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (38% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | UT Average | vs. UT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Deficiencies
| 2 | 3 | This facility has 33% fewer deficiencies than a typical Utah nursing home (2 vs. UT avg 3).↓ 33% better |
|
Deficiencies High
| 1 | 1 | This facility has deficiencies high in line with the Utah average (1 vs. UT avg 1).— At avg |
|
Deficiencies Moderate
| 0 | 1 | This facility has 100% fewer deficiencies moderate than a typical Utah nursing home (0 vs. UT avg 1).↓ 100% better |
|
Deficiencies Low
| 1 | 1 | This facility has deficiencies low in line with the Utah average (1 vs. UT avg 1).— At avg |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 0.5 | 0.8 | This facility has 38% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Utah nursing home (0.5 vs. UT avg 0.8).↓ 38% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | UT Average | vs. UT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 4 | 4 | This facility has total inspections in line with the Utah average (4 vs. UT avg 4).— At avg |
|
Inspections with deficiencies
| 2 | 2 | This facility has inspections with deficiencies in line with the Utah average (2 vs. UT avg 2).— At avg |
|
Inspection deficiency rate
| 50% | 50% | This facility has inspection deficiency rate in line with the Utah average (50 vs. UT avg 50).— At avg |
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
Places of interest near Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing
1.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Salt Lake City's city center to Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Salt Lake City
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the UT Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Utah average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William E. Christoffersen Salt Lake Veterans Home | NH MC RC SNF | Salt Lake City (University) | 81
Facility
81
UT AVG
81
Rank
#84 / 189 |
90.1%
Facility
90.1%
UT AVG
71.7%
Rank
#13 / 66 | +26% | 5.68
Facility
5.68
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#4 / 69 | +32% | +53% | $12.7k
Facility
$12.7k
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#40 / 75 | 22
Facility
22
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#32 / 70 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#25 / 70 | 1 | 73 | - |
39
Facility
39
UT AVG
49
Rank
#174 / 266 | Avalon Va Management LLC | $12.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$12.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#17 / 71 | $6.9MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$6.9MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#13 / 71 | 53.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
53.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#25 / 69 | 465150 | ||||
| St. Joseph Villa | NH SNF | Salt Lake City | 221
Facility
221
UT AVG
81
Rank
#2 / 189 |
78.3%
Facility
78.3%
UT AVG
71.7%
Rank
#30 / 66 | +9% | 3.33
Facility
3.33
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#44 / 69 | -13% | -11% | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#1 / 75 | 14
Facility
14
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#15 / 70 | 4.7
Facility
4.7
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#16 / 70 | 3 | 173 | B- |
77
Facility
77
UT AVG
49
Rank
#23 / 266 | Successor Healthcare LLC | $28.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$28.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#1 / 71 | $14.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$14.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#1 / 71 | 51.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
51.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#32 / 69 | 465095 | ||||
| City Creek Post Acute | NH SNF | Salt Lake City (East Central) | 108
Facility
108
UT AVG
81
Rank
#51 / 189 |
63.9%
Facility
63.9%
UT AVG
71.7%
Rank
#46 / 66 | -11% | - | -54% | - | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#1 / 75 | 18
Facility
18
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#25 / 70 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#29 / 70 | 2 | 69 | - |
75
Facility
75
UT AVG
49
Rank
#33 / 266 | Avenues Healthcare, Inc | $7.9MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$7.9MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#40 / 71 | $4.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#31 / 71 | 57.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
57.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#14 / 69 | 465072 | ||||
| Life Care Center of Bountiful | NH SNF | Woods Cross | 100
Facility
100
UT AVG
81
Rank
#60 / 189 |
70.8%
Facility
70.8%
UT AVG
71.7%
Rank
#39 / 66 | -1% | 3.24
Facility
3.24
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#50 / 69 | -25% | -13% | $69.0k
Facility
$69.0k
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#66 / 75 | 21
Facility
21
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#31 / 70 | 4.2
Facility
4.2
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#15 / 70 | 4 | 71 | - |
62
Facility
62
UT AVG
49
Rank
#89 / 266 | Monument Health Bountiful LLC | $5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#52 / 71 | $3.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#41 / 71 | 69.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
69.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#3 / 69 | 465112 | ||||
| Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing | NH RC SNF | Salt Lake City | 36
Facility
36
UT AVG
81
Rank
#158 / 189 |
93.3%
Facility
93.3%
UT AVG
71.7%
Rank
#9 / 66 | +30% | 2.20
Facility
2.20
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#69 / 69 | - | -41% | $11.9k
Facility
$11.9k
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#38 / 75 | - | - | - | 34 | - |
73
Facility
73
UT AVG
49
Rank
#37 / 266 | - | - | - | - | 46A058 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Utah
Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing is located in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Utah.
Frequently Asked Questions about Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing
Is Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing in a walkable area?
Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing has a walk score of 73. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
What is the occupancy rate at Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing?
Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing's occupancy is 93%.
How long has Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing been in business?
Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing has been operating for approximately 37 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing?
No, Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing has a no-pet policy.
Does Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing is registered as a for-profit in UT.
How many beds does Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing have?
Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing has 36 beds.
Has Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing had any deficiencies?
Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing has had 2 reported deficiencies according to records from Utah Dept. of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





