Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
124
124 employees · 0 contractors · 62 on an average day Rosemont at Stone Mountain
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Stone Mountain, GA
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 11 points above the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 11 points above the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Rosemont at Stone Mountain
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Stone Mountain, GA
ALM Inspection Grade
A
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 11 points above the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 95 / 100, an A — 11 points above the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Rosemont at Stone Mountain accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Rosemont at Stone Mountain
Rosemont at Stone Mountain provides nursing home, skilled nursing, hospice care, memory care, and respite care in Stone Mountain, Georgia. Nursing home and skilled nursing services support residents who need ongoing residential care, with licensed nursing available on site around the clock. Memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering, while hospice care supports residents receiving end of life services. Respite care offers a short term stay when a usual caregiver needs time to travel, recover, or manage other responsibilities.
The range of care services may suit a resident whose needs or length of stay may change over time. Short term rehabilitation and therapy support recovery from an illness, injury, or hospital stay without requiring the family to arrange those services elsewhere. Transportation is available for residents who need rides, and outdoor space gives them an area to spend time outside.
Rosemont at Stone Mountain has 149 beds. Total nurse staffing is 2 hours and 7 minutes per resident each day, representing the daily nursing time allocated to each resident. Tamara Gentles serves as the administrator, and payment options include Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay. A Walk Score of 71 means the area is very walkable, with most errands possible on foot, so a resident who no longer drives may still reach nearby destinations independently.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 169th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
2h 7m
This nursing home is ranked 169th out of 169 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
2h 7mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +83% above Georgia average
5 of 6 metrics below Georgia average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
13m
↓ 58% · GA 30mThis facility: 13m per resident per day, 58% below the Georgia average of 30m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 25 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
25 staff · 8-hour shifts
34m
↓ 39% · GA 55mThis facility: 34m per resident per day, 39% below the Georgia average of 55m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 25 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
25 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 68 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
68 staff · 7.6-hour shifts
1h 21m
↓ 37% · GA 2h 9mThis facility: 1h 21m per resident per day, 37% below the Georgia average of 2h 9m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 68 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
68 staff · 7.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
6m
↑ 83% · GA 3mThis facility: 6m per resident per day, 83% above the Georgia average of 3m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
1h 56m
↓ 37% · GA 3h 6mThis facility: 1h 56m per resident per day, 37% below the Georgia average of 3h 6m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
16m
↓ 23% · GA 21mThis facility: 16m per resident per day, 23% below the Georgia average of 21m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
124
124 employees · 0 contractors · 62 on an average day
124 total staff / 137 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
0.91 : 1
↓ 37% · GA 1.43This facility: 0.91 staff per resident, 37% below the Georgia average of 1.43 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
124 staff ÷ 137 residents
See full Georgia ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.7 h
↓ 7% · GA 8.3 hThis facility: 7.7 h, 7% below the Georgia average of 8.3 h (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
43,436 staff hours this quarter
See full Georgia ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Georgia average: 94.3% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
149
Rank #49 / 206Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 206 nursing homes we track in Georgia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Georgia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
149
Rank #49 / 206Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 206 nursing homes we track in Georgia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Georgia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #151 / 189Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 151st out of 189 nursing homes we track in Georgia for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Georgia facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #151 / 189Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 151st out of 189 nursing homes we track in Georgia for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Georgia facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
7
years
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #22 / 210Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 210 nursing homes we track in Georgia for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Georgia facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #22 / 210Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 210 nursing homes we track in Georgia for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Georgia facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
71
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #36 / 161Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 161 nursing homes we track in Georgia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Georgia average, with its Statewide rank out of 161. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #36 / 161Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 161 nursing homes we track in Georgia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Georgia average, with its Statewide rank out of 161. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
92%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 137.1 residents and 149 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Georgia average: 83.6%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
200
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
StatusSnf/Nf Dual Cert
IssuanceDecember 31, 2018
CountyDekalb
CMS Certification Number115565
AHCA bronze award in 2025
Rosemont at Stone Mountain is administered by Tamara Gentles.
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Transportation
Email
tgentles@journey-hc.com
Pets not allowed
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
95 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
11 points above the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
35 severity-weighted points (11 deficiencies) · 31% lower than the typical CMS-certified GA facility (median: 51)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
33 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified GA facility (median: 44)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 14% · GA 3.5This facility: 3, 14% below the GA average of 3.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
11
Rank #44 / 170Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 170 nursing homes we track in Georgia for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Georgia State average, with a ranking across all 170 GA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 35% · GA 16.9This facility: 11, 35% below the GA average of 16.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.67
Rank #52 / 170Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 170 nursing homes we track in Georgia for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Georgia mean across 170 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 22% · GA 4.7This facility: 3.67, 22% below the GA average of 4.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
11 of 11 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the GA average of 0.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the GA average of 0.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
11
↓ 30% · GA 15.7This facility: 11, 30% below the GA average of 15.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the GA average of 0.1 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 07, 2026 · 6 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 4 of 11 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 07, 2026
6 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 20, 2025
4 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 27, 2023
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 11 citations
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (36%)
Resident Rights
3 deficiencies (27%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (9%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (9%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (9%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (9%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
6 of 11 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 5 of 11 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
GA avg $35KGeorgia average: $35,339. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
GA avg 1.6Georgia average: 1.6. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
GA avg 0.35Georgia average: 0.35. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Georgia average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 18% · GA 8.5This facility: 6.9, 18% below the GA average of 8.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 7% · GA 14.7This facility: 13.8, 7% below the GA average of 14.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 4 better, 2 worse, 3 near GA average, 1 without a benchmark
3 short-stay measures: 2 worse, 1 near GA average
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.4%
↓ 3% · GA 14.9This facility: 14.4, 3% below the GA average of 14.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.4%
↓ 3% · GA 14.9This facility: 14.4, 3% below the GA average of 14.9 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.5%
↓ 31% · GA 13.7This facility: 9.5, 31% below the GA average of 13.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.5%
↓ 31% · GA 13.7This facility: 9.5, 31% below the GA average of 13.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.4%
↑ 13% · GA 15.4This facility: 17.4, 13% above the GA average of 15.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.4%
↑ 13% · GA 15.4This facility: 17.4, 13% above the GA average of 15.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4%
↓ 82% · GA 2.4This facility: 0.4, 82% below the GA average of 2.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4%
↓ 82% · GA 2.4This facility: 0.4, 82% below the GA average of 2.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
↓ 43% · GA 3.2This facility: 1.8, 43% below the GA average of 3.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
↓ 43% · GA 3.2This facility: 1.8, 43% below the GA average of 3.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.8%
↑ 7% · GA 5.4This facility: 5.8, 7% above the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.8%
↑ 7% · GA 5.4This facility: 5.8, 7% above the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.1%
↓ 43% · GA 5.4This facility: 3.1, 43% below the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.1%
↓ 43% · GA 5.4This facility: 3.1, 43% below the GA average of 5.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
99.3%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
99.3%
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.1%
↑ 4% · GA 91.7This facility: 95.1, 4% above the GA average of 91.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.1%
↑ 4% · GA 91.7This facility: 95.1, 4% above the GA average of 91.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.5%
↑ 4% · GA 94.6This facility: 98.5, 4% above the GA average of 94.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.5%
↑ 4% · GA 94.6This facility: 98.5, 4% above the GA average of 94.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.5%
↑ 46% · GA 2.4This facility: 3.5, 46% above the GA average of 2.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.5%
↑ 46% · GA 2.4This facility: 3.5, 46% above the GA average of 2.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
63.0%
↓ 22% · GA 80.6This facility: 63.0, 22% below the GA average of 80.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
63.0%
↓ 22% · GA 80.6This facility: 63.0, 22% below the GA average of 80.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.2%
↑ 1% · GA 78.7This facility: 79.2, 1% above the GA average of 78.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.2%
↑ 1% · GA 78.7This facility: 79.2, 1% above the GA average of 78.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Rosemont at Stone Mountain’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 164 Georgia nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
3.0% operating margin
+21.4 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.5M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Georgia homes
16.2% payroll share of revenue
GA average 56.1%Rank #163 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 163rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.0M while revenue rose $0.9M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Georgia homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | GA median | Compared with GA homesRank in GA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $15.5M | +$0.9M | Trend 20162024 | GA median $10.4M | Rank in GA Rank #44 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 74% of homes | Above GA median Higher net patient revenue than 74% of GA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $15.0M | −$2.2M | Trend 20162024 | GA median $11.3M | Rank in GA Rank #54 / 164Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 67% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.5M | +$3.1M | Trend 20162024 | GA median −$0.1M | Rank in GA Rank #43 / 164Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 43rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 74% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 3.0% | +21.4 pts | Trend 20162024 | GA median −1.3% | Rank in GA Rank #49 / 164Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 71% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | GA median $0.1M | Rank in GA Rank #135 / 162Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 135th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Georgia for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.5M | +$3.0M | Trend — | GA median $0.0M | Rank in GA Rank #52 / 164Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Georgia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 69% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Georgia homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | GA median | Compared with GA homesRank in GA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $2.5M | +$1.0M | Trend 20162024 | GA median $5.5M | Rank in GA Rank #158 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 158th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 4% of homes | Below GA median Higher payroll than 4% of GA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 16.2% | +5.5 pts | Trend 20162024 | GA median 51.6% | Rank in GA Rank #163 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 163rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Georgia for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Georgia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Georgia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 1% of homes | 39.9 pts under GA average The GA average is 56.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · GA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Georgia payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin GA payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017no report | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.7M | $11.1M | $13.3M | $15.5M | $14.9M | $14.9M | $14.5M | $15.5M | |
| Operating expenses | $7.8M | $10.2M | $11.5M | $14.8M | $14.6M | $16.3M | $17.2M | $15.0M | |
| Net patient income | −$0.1M | $1.0M | $1.8M | $0.7M | $0.3M | −$1.4M | −$2.7M | $0.5M | |
| Operating margin | −1.5% | 8.7% | 13.6% | 4.6% | 2.2% | −9.5% | −18.5% | 3.0% | |
| Net income | −$0.1M | $1.0M | $1.8M | $1.7M | $1.1M | −$0.5M | −$2.5M | $0.5M | |
| Payroll costs | $4.5M | $4.1M | $4.5M | $4.7M | $3.8M | $2.3M | $1.6M | $2.5M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 58.5% | 37.1% | 34.2% | 30.3% | 25.6% | 15.4% | 10.7% | 16.2% | |
| Beds | 149 | 149 | 149 | 149 | 149 | 149 | 149 | 149 | |
| Gross revenue | $8.5M | $13.2M | $15.3M | $17.3M | $16.3M | $16.3M | $15.7M | $16.6M | |
| Salaries | $4.0M | $3.6M | $3.9M | $4.1M | $3.2M | $1.7M | $1.1M | $1.8M | |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.7M | |
| Contract labor | — | $0.7M | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Other operating costs | $3.3M | $6.0M | $6.9M | $10.1M | $10.7M | $14.0M | $15.7M | $12.5M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $161 | $221 | $254 | $304 | $317 | $291 | $283 | $313 | |
| Cost per day | $163 | $202 | $219 | $290 | $310 | $319 | $335 | $303 | |
| Average length of stay | 95.8 days | — | 128.6 days | 151.2 days | 133.8 days | 158.1 days | 197.0 days | 199.8 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
176 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
72 · 41%
Medicaid
50 · 28%
Private pay & other
54 · 31%
Resident snapshot
137 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
19 · 14%
Medicaid
80 · 58%
Private pay & other
38 · 28%
Leaving
248 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
60 · 24%
Medicaid
124 · 50%
Private pay & other
64 · 26%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Rosemont at Stone Mountain
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Stone Mountain's city center to Rosemont at Stone Mountain's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Rosemont at Stone Mountain
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the GA Dept. of Community Health (DCH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Georgia average is: 56.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center | NH MC SNF | Tucker | 100
Facility
100
GA AVG
113
Rank
#99 / 206 | A |
93.1%
Facility
93.1%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#33 / 161 | +11% | 3.01
Facility
3.01
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#135 / 169 | -47% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 16
Facility
16
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#44 / 170 | 3.2
Facility
3.2
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#26 / 170 | - | 93 | - |
63
Facility
63
GA AVG
44
Rank
#53 / 210 | Baren Akers | $12.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#66 / 164 | $6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#61 / 164 | 51.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
51.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#88 / 164 | 115322 | ||||
| Magnolia Manor Methodist Nsg C | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | Americus | 238
Facility
238
GA AVG
113
Rank
#7 / 206 | A- |
72.1%
Facility
72.1%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#133 / 161 | -14% | 3.30
Facility
3.30
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#95 / 169 | -36% | -8% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 13
Facility
13
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#61 / 170 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#36 / 170 | - | 172 | - |
73
Facility
73
GA AVG
44
Rank
#14 / 210 | Brad Fussell | $16.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$16.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#38 / 164 | $9.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$9.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#21 / 164 | 54.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
54.8%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#60 / 164 | 115004 | ||||
| Twin Fountains Home | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Lagrange | 116
Facility
116
GA AVG
113
Rank
#82 / 206 | B+ |
84.9%
Facility
84.9%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#98 / 161 | +2% | 3.95
Facility
3.95
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#27 / 169 | +35% | +10% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 13
Facility
13
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#61 / 170 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#72 / 170 | 1 | 99 | A+ |
9
Facility
9
GA AVG
44
Rank
#189 / 210 | - | $294.0MFiscal year ending 01/2024
Facility
$294.0MFiscal year ending 01/2024
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#1 / 164 | $6.7MFiscal year ending 01/2024
Facility
$6.7MFiscal year ending 01/2024
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#55 / 164 | 2.3%Fiscal year ending 01/2024
Facility
2.3%Fiscal year ending 01/2024
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#164 / 164 | 115709 | ||||
| Powder Springs Center for Nursing & Healing | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Powder Springs | 208
Facility
208
GA AVG
113
Rank
#15 / 206 | C |
91.6%
Facility
91.6%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#41 / 161 | +10% | 3.06
Facility
3.06
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#120 / 169 | -10% | -15% | $16.8k
Facility
$16.8k
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#147 / 172 | 24
Facility
24
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#122 / 170 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#114 / 170 | 2 | 191 | A+ |
46
Facility
46
GA AVG
44
Rank
#112 / 210 | Powder Springs Operating LLC | $23.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$23.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#5 / 164 | $10.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$10.9MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#10 / 164 | 47%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
47%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#119 / 164 | 115538 | ||||
| Rosemont at Stone Mountain | NH HOS MC RC SNF | Stone Mountain | 149
Facility
149
GA AVG
113
Rank
#49 / 206 | A |
92.0%
Facility
92.0%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#36 / 161 | +10% | 2.12
Facility
2.12
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#169 / 169 | -24% | -41% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 11
Facility
11
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#44 / 170 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#52 / 170 | - | 137 | - |
71
Facility
71
GA AVG
44
Rank
#22 / 210 | Arthur Grace | $15.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#44 / 164 | $2.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#158 / 164 | 16.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
16.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#163 / 164 | 115565 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other GA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Rosemont at Stone Mountain
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Rosemont at Stone Mountain in a walkable area?
Rosemont at Stone Mountain has a walk score of 71. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Rosemont at Stone Mountain?
Rosemont at Stone Mountain's occupancy is 92%.
03 How long has Rosemont at Stone Mountain been in business?
Rosemont at Stone Mountain has been operating for approximately 7 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
04 Are pets allowed at Rosemont at Stone Mountain?
No, Rosemont at Stone Mountain has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for Rosemont at Stone Mountain?
The team at Rosemont at Stone Mountain can be reached at tgentles@journey-hc.com.
06 Does Rosemont at Stone Mountain operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Rosemont at Stone Mountain is registered as a for-profit in GA.
07 Who is the administrator of Rosemont at Stone Mountain?
Tamara Gentles is the administrator of Rosemont at Stone Mountain.
Updated on
