Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Salt Lake City, UT
Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Salt Lake City, UT
Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing accepts Medicaid.
Overview of Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing
With a team of brilliant and compassionate healthcare professionals, Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing is renowned for its unwavering commitment to delivering top-notch care in a warm and engaging environment. The facility boasts comprehensive services, including intensive therapy programs designed to optimize recovery and promote optimal health. The skilled nursing staff, known for their exceptional clinical skills, are trained in the latest best practices to ensure that residents receive the highest quality care possible.
The home proudly accepts and completes Medicaid pending status, making their exceptional care accessible to a spectrum of seniors with varying financial capacities. This commitment to inclusivity and compassion is a shining example of Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing’s unwavering commitment to excellence. Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing residents are not just patients but cherished members of a vibrant and supportive community.
Staffing hours
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
Hours per resident per day vs Utah averages
Staff type
Hours / day / resident
vs state avg
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
1h 23m
+17% State avg: 1h 11m per day · National avg: 41m per day
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
10m
−67% State avg: 30m per day · National avg: 52m per day
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
2h 13m
−6% State avg: 2h 22m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
3h 11m
−9% State avg: 3h 31m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
−86% State avg: 7m per day · National avg: 4m per day
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
56m
+12% State avg: 50m per day · National avg: 29m per day
4 of 6 metrics below state avg
41-bed community Rank #152 / 189Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 152nd out of 189 homes we track in Utah for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Utah facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A moderately sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
29 years in operation Rank #52 / 194Years in operation — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 52nd out of 194 homes we track in Utah for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Utah facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care.
Walk Score: 70 / 100 Rank #57 / 266Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 57th out of 266 homes we track in Utah for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Utah facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Utah that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
BBB Rating: A+ (Not Accredited)
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
How BBB ratings work
How BBB ratings work
About this community
Facility TypeNursing Care Facility
StatusActive
IssuanceMay 1, 1997
ExpirationNovember 30, 2026
CountySalt Lake
Accept Medicaid
Rehabilitation Services
Respite Care
Short-Term Rehab
24-Hour Staffing
Pets not allowed
Activities
Operating Hours24/7
Inspection History
In Utah, the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Facility Licensing conducts regular onsite inspections to ensure compliance with state and federal healthcare standards.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Utah state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. UT average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 At Avg
Metrics at Utah average:
• Deficiencies Moderate (at UT avg) 6 Better Metrics better than Utah average:
• Deficiencies (67% below)
• Deficiencies High (100% below)
• Deficiencies Low (100% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (63% below)
• Inspections with deficiencies (50% below)
• Inspection deficiency rate (34% below)
• Deficiencies Moderate (at UT avg) 6 Better Metrics better than Utah average:
• Deficiencies (67% below)
• Deficiencies High (100% below)
• Deficiencies Low (100% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (63% below)
• Inspections with deficiencies (50% below)
• Inspection deficiency rate (34% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | UT Average | vs. UT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Deficiencies
Total deficiencies cited across all inspections on record. Utah reports these by severity; the levels below add up to this figure.
| 1 | 3 | This facility has 67% fewer deficiencies than a typical Utah nursing home (1 vs. UT avg 3).↓ 67% better |
|
Deficiencies High
Part of the Deficiencies total above — those cited at high severity. The severity levels add up to the total.
| 0 | 1 | This facility has 100% fewer deficiencies high than a typical Utah nursing home (0 vs. UT avg 1).↓ 100% better |
|
Deficiencies Moderate
Part of the Deficiencies total above — those cited at moderate severity. The severity levels add up to the total.
| 1 | 1 | This facility has deficiencies moderate in line with the Utah average (1 vs. UT avg 1).— At avg |
|
Deficiencies Low
Part of the Deficiencies total above — those cited at low severity. The severity levels add up to the total.
| 0 | 1 | This facility has 100% fewer deficiencies low than a typical Utah nursing home (0 vs. UT avg 1).↓ 100% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 0.3 | 0.8 | This facility has 63% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Utah nursing home (0.3 vs. UT avg 0.8).↓ 63% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | UT Average | vs. UT Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 3 | 4 | This facility has had 25% fewer total inspections than the Utah average (3 vs. UT avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 25% fewer |
|
Inspections with deficiencies
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory deficiency.
| 1 | 2 | This facility has 50% fewer inspections with deficiencies than a typical Utah nursing home (1 vs. UT avg 2).↓ 50% better |
|
Inspection deficiency rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one deficiency.
| 33% | 50% | This facility has 17 percentage points lower inspection deficiency rate than a typical Utah nursing home (33% vs. UT avg 50%).↓ 17% better |
Places of interest near Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing
3.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Salt Lake City's city center to Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Salt Lake City
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the UT Dept. of Health & Human Services (DHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Utah average is: 49.5% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William E. Christoffersen Salt Lake Veterans Home | NH MC RC SNF | Salt Lake City (University) | 81
Facility
81
UT AVG
81
Rank
#84 / 189 |
90.1%
Facility
90.1%
UT AVG
71.7%
Rank
#13 / 66 | +26% | 5.68
Facility
5.68
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#4 / 69 | +32% | +53% | $12.7k
Facility
$12.7k
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#40 / 75 | 22
Facility
22
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#32 / 70 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#25 / 70 | 1 | 73 | - |
39
Facility
39
UT AVG
49
Rank
#174 / 266 | Avalon Va Management LLC | $12.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$12.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#17 / 71 | $6.9MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$6.9MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#13 / 71 | 53.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
53.9%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#25 / 69 | 465150 | ||||
| St. Joseph Villa | NH SNF | Salt Lake City | 221
Facility
221
UT AVG
81
Rank
#2 / 189 |
78.3%
Facility
78.3%
UT AVG
71.7%
Rank
#30 / 66 | +9% | 3.33
Facility
3.33
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#44 / 69 | -13% | -11% | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#1 / 75 | 14
Facility
14
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#15 / 70 | 4.7
Facility
4.7
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#16 / 70 | 3 | 173 | B- |
77
Facility
77
UT AVG
49
Rank
#23 / 266 | Successor Healthcare LLC | $28.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$28.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#1 / 71 | $14.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$14.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#1 / 71 | 51.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
51.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#32 / 69 | 465095 | ||||
| City Creek Post Acute | NH SNF | Salt Lake City (East Central) | 108
Facility
108
UT AVG
81
Rank
#51 / 189 |
63.9%
Facility
63.9%
UT AVG
71.7%
Rank
#46 / 66 | -11% | - | -54% | - | $0
Facility
$0
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#1 / 75 | 18
Facility
18
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#25 / 70 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#29 / 70 | 2 | 69 | - |
75
Facility
75
UT AVG
49
Rank
#33 / 266 | Avenues Healthcare, Inc | $7.9MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$7.9MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#40 / 71 | $4.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#31 / 71 | 57.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
57.4%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#14 / 69 | 465072 | ||||
| Life Care Center of Bountiful | NH SNF | Woods Cross | 100
Facility
100
UT AVG
81
Rank
#60 / 189 |
70.8%
Facility
70.8%
UT AVG
71.7%
Rank
#39 / 66 | -1% | 3.24
Facility
3.24
UT AVG
3.72
Rank
#50 / 69 | -25% | -13% | $69.0k
Facility
$69.0k
UT AVG
$52.4k
Rank
#66 / 75 | 21
Facility
21
UT AVG
27.7
Rank
#31 / 70 | 4.2
Facility
4.2
UT AVG
7.6
Rank
#15 / 70 | 4 | 71 | - |
62
Facility
62
UT AVG
49
Rank
#89 / 266 | Monument Health Bountiful LLC | $5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$9.3M
Rank
#52 / 71 | $3.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
$4.5M
Rank
#41 / 71 | 69.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
69.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
UT AVG
49.5%
Rank
#3 / 69 | 465112 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Utah
Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing is located in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Utah.
Frequently Asked Questions about Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing
Is Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing in a walkable area?
Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing has a walk score of 70. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
When does Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing's license expire?
According to UT state health department records, Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing's license expires on November 30, 2026.
How long has Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing been in business?
Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing has been operating for approximately 29 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing?
No, Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing has a no-pet policy.
How many beds does Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing have?
Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing has 41 beds.
Has Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing had any deficiencies?
Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing has had 1 reported deficiency since 2025 according to records from Utah Dept. of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
Are there photos of Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing?
Yes — there are 8 photos of Meadow Brook Rehab and Nursing in the photo gallery on this page.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
